A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 22:30 on September 13, 2016, the victim E (n, 26 years of age) who entered a singing room in C, D, “D” No. 4 of “D,” located in C, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant sent the victim’s face part to several times by hand on the victim’s face; (b) had the victim’s shoulder exceeded the victim’s shoulder, and then, (c) had the victim’s face and body part cut back to the victim’s upper part, and (d) had the victim’s face and body part to be treated for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. On-site photographs and suspect E-mail photographs;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. A report on internal investigation (a internal investigation into the suspect E's right chest door);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (report on telephone conversations with a witness H);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of injury and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. Reduction in the mitigated area (two months to one year) of Class 1 (General Bodily Injury) (Special Sentencing) of the mitigated area according to the sentencing guidelines: Minor injury and non-minor of punishment;

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant, who is the female employee of an entertainment shop, does not appear in mind.

In light of the background, method and consequence of the crime, etc., the crime is not good, and the mental suffering suffered by the victim seems to be considerable, and the defendant is different from the victim.

Appellanting that the victim did not seem to have a serious reflective attitude, such as causing additional pain by having the victim go to the court, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished several times due to the violation of the Act on Punishment, etc. of Injury, Violence, Violence, etc., and again committed the crime of this case.