1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

2. Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000 (per million).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 22, 2017, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for a violation of the Vocational Stability Act at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on November 22, 2017, and the judgment was finalized on November 30, 2017.

1. Defendant A’s perjury (hereinafter “E”) was tried for Defendant A’s violation of the Vocational Stability Act 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2394 on the ground that Defendant A’s perjury did not register with the competent authority, and arranged and received commission for singing.

When the Defendant filed an application for witness by B who works in a singing voice while the above trial was in progress, the Defendant had B give testimony to the effect that B did not have any voice, and had B give testimony to the effect that he did not have any voice through his singing, thereby having the Defendant be acquitted from the above trial.

On November 1, 2017, the Defendant turned B around his house located in F in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, 14:00, with B, to the Jung-gu District Court.

A During the Do, the Defendant does not speak to B that “at the time of testimony, the words “the head of the internal office,” and the words “the head of the internal office,” and attempted to do so by internal introduction. As to the contents of mutual conversations, I find another doping distance.

The Defendant demanded the testimony to the effect that the Defendant does not offer good offices for singing, such as “”.

B In response to the demand of the Defendant, at around 16:00 on the same day, he appeared as a witness in the court No. 4 of the 23rd Government District Court at around 16:00 on the same day, and took an oath, and thereafter he did not perform the work of singing through the Defendant, as described in paragraph 2.

“The testimony was made to the effect that “ was false.”

Accordingly, the defendant instigated B to give perjury.

2. Defendant B’s perjury appeared as a witness on November 1, 2017, at a court of law No. 4 of the Jung-gu District Court around 16:00, Defendant 2017 High Court 2394 High Court order 2017 High Court order 2394 Ga, and tried as a witness for a violation of the Occupational Stabilization Act against Defendant B.