logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.01.28 2014가단5475
금형대금
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KRW 29,700,000 and the amount of said KRW from May 29, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person engaged in gold-type manufacturing business under the trade name of “B,” and the Defendant is a company that manufactures and supplies motor vehicle parts, etc. to two motor vehicles, etc.

B. Around February 20, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a development agreement with the Defendant on the production and supply of a pair of motor vehicles A-150 gold paper (two softs, two softs, and two softs; hereinafter “the instant gold paper”) as follows.

ARTICLE 2: 110,00,000 won (additional tax) for production, development period - 60 days from the date of data transfer, Article 3 of the provision of samples of gynite products: gynites shall be produced for production purposes of mass production.

Design and data necessary for mass production shall be supplied by Gap (Defendant), and ownership shall be owned by Gap (Defendant).

Article 5: (Liability for Expenses) Gap (Defendant), Eul (Plaintiff), 5,000,00 won, 50% at the time of the contract with the method of approval, part payments, 30% at the time of completion, and 20% at the time of completion: Joint investments shall be made in 50:50 won at the time of completion of development costs by agreement between Gap and Eul.

Article 10:A shall pay B the depreciation costs of gold development costs to B, including the product price.

A. Product: A separate agreement shall be made.

The depreciation cost: 10,000 won = 7500 sett, 5,000 won = 20,000 sett Article 11: A, and in case where either of the parties A or B breaches this contract, appropriate compensation shall be made upon the other party’s claim for damages.

C. On March 6, 2013, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff the development cost of KRW 55 million according to the instant gold contract.

On May 1, 2013, the Plaintiff sent to C an e-mail that the Defendant would complete the instant gold production if he paid the Plaintiff additional KRW 65 million, considering the difficulty of completing the instant gold production to C in cooperative relations with the Defendant.

E. On May 9, 2013, the Defendant paid additional KRW 35 million to the Plaintiff and received the instant gold penalty.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, evidence Nos. 1, and evidence Nos. 1 to 4 include each number, below.

arrow