logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 29. 선고 2016두44513 판결
부정한 방법으로 법인세 등을 포탈한 경우, 법인세 제67조에 따른 처분의 부과제척기간[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu6475 (Law No. 14, 2016)

Title

In case of evading corporate tax by improper means, the exclusion period for disposition under Article 67 of the Corporate Tax Act;

Summary

The argument on the grounds of appeal by appellant is that the grounds prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal are not included or are not reasonable.

Related statutes

The exclusion period for national tax assessment under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2016Du44513. Revocation of notice of change in income amount

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Industrial Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu64475 Decided June 14, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

September 29, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow