The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) against the accused against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Considering the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and made a mistake against the victim D, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim G, J,O, S, and U is relatively heavy, the degree of injury of the victim G, and the victim G, the crime of assault, bodily injury, obstruction of performance of official duties, the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-license) and other factors such as the defendant's violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-victim) and the circumstances where the victims other than the victim D have not been completely recovered and endeavored to recover from damage do not appear. In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the punishment imposed by the court below is harsh.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.