1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. On January 10, 1962, the deceased on January 10, 1962, after purchasing real estate listed in the attached list from the defendant around 1959 and taking over and cultivating it.

B. Plaintiff C, Plaintiff D, and Plaintiff E, each of whom was the wife of the network I, jointly succeeded to the network I at the ratio of 1/9 shares, 3/9 shares of Plaintiff B, who is the wife of the network I, 3/9 shares, and 2/9 shares of Plaintiff J, who is the husband of the Republic of Korea, jointly succeeded to the network I at the ratio of 3/5 shares, and 2/9 shares of the J on May 9, 2002.

C. After the death of the deceased I, the above real estate was occupied by the Plaintiff A, and came to light.

According to the above sales contract, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer to the plaintiffs, who are the latter part of the deceased I, as stated in the claim.

2. According to the ex officio decision-making records as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant is recognized to have been born on the date K, and in light of the Defendant’s aforementioned birth time and empirical rule, the Defendant may be ratified to have died at the time of filing the instant lawsuit.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Da5873 delivered on April 26, 2002). Therefore, the Plaintiffs’ instant lawsuit is unlawful as against the deceased person.

3. The lawsuit of this case is dismissed as unlawful.