logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.28 2014고단155
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 1.5 million won or more as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-gu branch on August 25, 2006, and 1.5 million won or more as a fine in the same court on April 30, 2009.

1. On January 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was a person driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice; (b) the Defendant driven C Poter cargo at a level of about 0.083% alcohol level from the front side of a restaurant for the head of the ambridge located in the Gu and Eup, the Gu and Eup, to the vicinity of the housing located in 49-6-6, the Gu and Sinsi-Eup, the 1km alcohol level of which is over 0.083%.

2. Around January 25, 2014, the Defendant was a victim D (year 26) who was driven on the opposite part while driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and became a vision, and the victim was driving away from the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant set the vehicle into the near F in Gumisisi E, and then she saw the victim “Chewing gue, dyleno,” and saw the victim’s fry, etc. at one time, and flaf at one time for drinking.

3. On January 25, 2014, around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant was assaulted in the vicinity of the house located near the 49-6-ro 5-6, Gosi-Eup, Gosi-si; (b) the Defendant, upon receiving the said D’s notification, sent out to the site by the police officers belonging to the G District of the Gu and the police officers of the Gu police station G District of the U.S., who escaped, expressed that “the Defendant was feasible, drinking out of the night,” and expressed that “the Defendant was feasible, feasible, and drinking out of the night,” and she took the face of H on one occasion with his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the patrol and suppression of the above H 112 crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. Investigation report (on the site visit, the situation, etc.);

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal history records; and

arrow