logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.07.19 2013나2001226
사해행위취소
Text

1. At the request of an exchange change from the trial, the defendant C shall enter F in the Schedule of Attached Real Estate.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The provisional registration of this case and the registration of transfer of this case" in Section 6, Section 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "the provisional registration of this case", "E" in Sections 6, 18, and 19 as "E", and the part 14, Section 20 as "Therefore, the contract of this case constitutes a fraudulent act detrimental to the plaintiff who is the creditor," and the defendant C shall be obliged to implement the procedure for cancellation registration of the provisional registration of this case as the restoration to the original state following the cancellation of the contract of this case, and the part of the provisional registration of this case shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the deletion of Section 7

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C, which is changed in exchange in the trial, is justified (the provisional registration of this case against the defendant B and C and the claim for cancellation registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case's provisional registration of this case are withdrawn due to the exchange change of litigation in the trial court's trial and the judgment of the court of the first instance is invalidated). The plaintiff's claim against the defendant A and B are accepted in all of the grounds. The judgment of the court of the first instance is just and correct as the conclusion is consistent with this, and all appeals of the defendant corporation A and B are dismissed as it is without merit, and

arrow