1. A ship that connects each point of the separate sheet No. 13, 14, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13 among the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is owned by the plaintiff and defendant B in proportion to 98/808 and the defendant C in proportion to 612/808. It can be acknowledged that there was no agreement on the method of partition of the instant real estate between the plaintiff and the defendants.

According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff, as co-owners, may claim the division of the instant real estate against the Defendants.

Furthermore, with regard to the method of partition of co-owned property, the Plaintiff scam in the ship which connects each point of the items of the attached drawings No. 13, 14, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13 among the real property of this case, and the Plaintiff scam in the part of the ship which connects each point of the attached drawings No. 15, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 15 of the same drawing No. 15, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 15 of the same drawing No. 15, 2, 3, 4, 15, 14, 13, 11, 12, and 15 of the same drawing No. 3, considering all circumstances, it is reasonable to divide the real property of this case as stated in the order of this case.