logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.07.26 2019구합57
서울교통공사 부당해고구제재심신청 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor was a corporation that conducts the construction and operation of urban railroads in Seoul Special Metropolitan City and the Seoul Metropolitan City Urban Railroad Corporation was incorporated on May 31, 2017.

On May 16, 1996, the Plaintiff is a person who joined the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Railroad Corporation as a civil engineering occupation, who works in the D Safety Management Officer from September 1, 2017 to December 4, 2017, and works in the E Civil Engineering Management Office.

B. On December 23, 2017, the Intervenor dismissed the Plaintiff on the ground that “the Intervenor was engaged in several abusive languages to female employees in work.”

The grounds for disciplinary action: around 13:20 on December 21, 2017, the Plaintiff made female employees (Grade 7 and F) working at the E Civil Engineering Service Office feel fear, displeasure, and sexual humiliation by verbal abuse, such as Cyle, Cye, and Cymn, and abusive language, and abusive language, and abusive language, such as abusive language, hye, hume, etc., - The Plaintiff instructed the Plaintiff to conduct on-site inspections and emergency response training, which are the main duties of D Safety Control Official for about four months from September 1, 2017 to December 21, 2017, but regardless of his/her duties, the Plaintiff continued to engage in the fying work by arbitrarily mixing cement and light fire, and the Plaintiff applied the former Seoul Metropolitan Government Regulations to the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Railroad Corporation without any interference with or interference with the Plaintiff’s personnel management and emergency response.

Article 6 (1), Article 8, and Article 10 (1) of the Rules of Employment, Article 52 of the Regulations on Personnel Management of Urban Railroad Corporations, Article 51 of the former Regulations on Personnel Management of Urban Railroad Corporations.

arrow