Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving of the Dok branch cargo vehicle owned by the (State) Grandroth.
At around 17:00 on May 10, 2013, the Defendant was going to go to the back from the maintenance work site, which was located in the 172-1 Hyundai Industrial Complex, Gangseo-gu, Jung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering direction, brakes, other devices, etc. of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the part of the defendant's vehicle rear D (the age of 47 years, South and North), which is coming from the aftermath due to negligence while neglecting this, was shocked by the defendant's vehicle rear part.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as light and fluoral salt, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it is apparent that the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 14, 2013, which is the date the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 326(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act