logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고정2956
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a B-A-Wood passenger vehicle.

On March 11, 2012, the Defendant driving the said car at around 17:00 and driving the said car at around 84.8km points in the direction of the day-to-day Incheon Metropolitan Bupyeong-gu, Busan, in accordance with the fourth-lane of the four-lanes, the Defendant is at the speed of about 60km between the two-lanes. As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely keep the safety distance to avoid when the said car stops.

Nevertheless, there is a failure to do so and progress prior to the failure of progress.

The back part of the D SP car driven by the victim C(W, 37 years of age) who was driven by the vehicle at the designated body of the vehicle was received as the front part of the vehicle driven by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury of light salt, etc. that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the above C, the injury of base salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the injured party E (the 37-year-old age), the injury of the victim F (the 4-year-old) who was on the above damaged vehicle, and the injury of the pelum typ in need of medical treatment to the victim G (the 2-year-old) who was on the said damaged vehicle for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, the victims expressed their intention not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, and thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of

arrow