beta
Text
The judgment below
The part against the defendant shall be reversed.
A fine of 300.30
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The lower court’s punishment (one million won per punishment) is too unreasonable.
B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. Before determining the reasons for an ex officio appeal, the defendant was sentenced ex officio on June 2, 2016 to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and six months, and on November 10, 2016 after being sentenced to a short of one year and a short of one year. The judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2016. As such, the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below is in the concurrent relationship between the crime of injury for which the judgment became final and conclusive, and the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below is in the concurrent relationship between the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, and should be sentenced to a punishment for the crime of the judgment of the court below in consideration of equity with
3. In conclusion, the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant is reversed, and it is again decided as follows, after pleading.
[Judgment as to the Defendant] The summary of the facts constituting the crime and the evidence admitted by this Court and the summary of the evidence were confirmed on November 10, 2016 on the first copy of the crime of the lower judgment. The first copy of the crime of “Defendant B” was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and six months on June 22, 2016 and a short of one year on November 10, 2016.
“A previous conviction in the judgment of the court below” is added at the end of the summary of the evidence of the court below, and except for the addition of “a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history,” as stated in each corresponding column of the court below, since it is the same as stated in Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act, except for the addition of “a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history,” (B) and the text of the judgment of the court below (the Suwon District Court 2016 High Court 14,28 (Joint), 1215 (Joint), 1382 (Joint), 179 (Joint), 196 (Joint), 2743 (Joint), 2743).
Application of Statutes
1..