1. The Defendant’s KRW 54,924,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from May 23, 2015 to November 29, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 2, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) contracted a human test work with the Defendant with respect to the letter, emblem, golf driving range, etc. located in Jung-gu, Seoul; and (b) completed the first construction work around December 24, 2014, which was operated by the Defendant.

Afterwards, the Plaintiff performed additional construction on fire-fighting systems, emergency opening facilities, women's death concern or glass wood works, wood painting facilities, fire sprinking facilities, golf course facilities, and sprinking facilities at the request of the Defendant, and delivered the construction site to the Defendant around January 2015.

B. Meanwhile, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 35,00,000,000 on December 1, 2014, and KRW 35,000,000 on December 15, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to settle the construction cost on the basis of the actual cost after the completion of the construction work at the time of interior construction work. As such, the instant construction cost was calculated by adding the first and the additional construction cost to KRW 101,969,814, 7,137,886, and corporate profit (8%) 8,157,585, including the total construction cost, KRW 117,265,285, and value-added tax of KRW 11,726,528, and KRW 128,91,813. Accordingly, the Defendant was obligated to suspend the Plaintiff’s payment of the remainder of the construction cost at KRW 128,91,813, and KRW 35,000,000, and KRW 300,000, KRW 200, KRW 4000, KRW 1400, and KRW 204, the Defendant had the obligation to pay the remainder of the construction cost to the Plaintiff.