1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,098,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from July 5, 2017 to June 20, 2019.

1. On March 11, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she had been paid KRW 91,00,000,000, totaling KRW 91,52,000,000 from the Defendant on March 11, 201, because the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the interior work of KRW 130,00,00 (value-added tax separate) for the payment of the construction cost, and the Defendant has the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the construction cost under the agreement and the delayed payment of KRW 52,00,000 ( KRW 143,00,000,000) from the Defendant on March 11, 2017.

On March 23, 2017, the Plaintiff specified the additional construction cost and the part excluded from the existing construction cost, and agreed on the additional construction cost of KRW 9,150,00 for the first additional construction cost and KRW 2,50,000 for the second additional construction cost, and agreed on the additional construction cost of KRW 11,650,00 for the second additional construction cost (value-added tax separate) and paid KRW 9,150,00 for the Defendant. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the remainder of the additional construction cost of KRW 3,65,00 for the Plaintiff ( KRW 12,815,00 for - KRW 9,150,00 for the second construction cost) and damages for delay.

Since the costs of defect repair incurred by the Plaintiff’s construction works are KRW 11,138,00, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 44,527,000 won ( KRW 55,65,000 - KRW 11,138,00) and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the day following the day on which a copy of the complaint is served to the Plaintiff, and with respect to the remainder of the money, the damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 41,50,000 shall be paid to the Plaintiff at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of

2. Whether the Plaintiff’s claim for the construction cost under the contract for construction works arises;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a written contract for construction work on March 11, 2017, and the content thereof are as follows (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”).

1. Construction works for the name of the construction work;

2. Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the construction site:

3. Defendant ordering person;

4. Project d. D. D.