logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.03 2013고단2016
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2013, at around 21:50, the Defendant received a demand from the victim E (the age of 35) who is the chief police officer of the police box called up after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report while under the influence of alcohol on the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul at around 21:50.

Accordingly, the Defendant expressed a bath that “D police box F and Suwon Police Station G would manipulate the case,” and read “Woo chrop chrop chrop chrop, spably flap, spably flap,” and flabed off the victim’s flab, and flabed off the right hand hand.

Since then, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties and was accompanied by the D police box, and the Defendant saw as “the fighting assistant is well fighting within the police box, so that he fights at a rank sweld, sweld, sweld, sweld twice, and harming himself, etc., and re-sweld with the D police box at around 04:50 on March 18, 2013 on the following day, and found the 27 patrol car that is moving back before the said police box, and 6-7 meters away from the sweld part of his shoulder, and sweld with it on the floor, such as swelves.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the victim's 112 reporting processing, prevention and suppression of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted dump and tension injury on the part of other fingers that require approximately 14 days medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and diagnosis reports;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the suspended sentence);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order (the decision of type) is violence (the person who is a special person).

arrow