1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons why the citer of the judgment of the court of first instance states concerning this case are as follows, except that the plaintiffs added the following judgments to the pertinent part, thereby citing this in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants caused the Plaintiff to obtain a large amount of fluorial fluoral colon by negligence at the time of executing the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, thereby leading to mass blood transfusion. In addition, the Defendants did not perform their duty to explain to the Plaintiffs from the time of the examination at

B. According to the results of the examination of the medical record on the Seoul Hospital at Macheon National University, as to whether there was negligence of causing astronomical mal mar in the self-government hospital at the time of using water, and on the commission of the examination on the medical record on the Seoul National University Hospital, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital continued to perform the mal marization for the Plaintiff’s mal marization. The Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel, from around 08:40 on February 14, 2014, may recognize the fact of blood transfusioning 3 pint from around 08:40 on the part of the Defendant Hospital, but only by itself, there was a astronomical mar in the Plaintiff’s self-government hospital.

It is insufficient to view it as a result of negligence at the time of the Defendants’ implementation of water stuffing, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

Therefore, the above part of the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

C. A doctor’s duty to explain to a patient who has violated the duty to explain arises in all stages of medical treatment, such as examination, diagnosis, and treatment, not only at the time of surgery, but also at all stages of such duty to explain. However, if a doctor’s duty to pay consolation money, etc., without properly explaining the patient, and a doctor’s duty to explain results in unexpected results to the patient by performing surgery, etc., the patient’s symptoms, treatment, etc. are provided prior to such act.