1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking payment of unpaid wages and retirement allowances by Seoul Southern District Court 2006Gaso64106, and rendered the same judgment as the written claim on November 1, 2006. The fact that the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2006 does not conflict between the parties, or that it is recognized in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as set forth in the evidence No. 1-3 and No. 1-2.

According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay the amount stated in the purport of the claim according to the previous judgment that became final and conclusive to the plaintiff, and the lawsuit of this case filed for the purpose of the extension of prescription due to the excessive completion of the statute of limitations after the

Although the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim was repaid by receiving dividends as wage creditors, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted since there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's argument.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.