A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On September 7, 2013, the Defendant received an accident with regard to the accident from the customer center of the victim’s Ofire and marine insurance (hereinafter “victim company”) at a place where the location cannot be known, and received the accident to the effect that “on September 7, 2013, the accident occurred while driving the Cone Star car on the Gone Star-dong-dong (hereinafter “Defendant”) around Sep. 7, 2013, the Defendant called to the customer center of the victim’s Ofire and marine insurance (hereinafter “victim company”) and called to the effect that “on September 7, 2013, the accident occurred while driving the Cone Star-si car at the Cone Star-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter “A member of the victim company”).” The Defendant made a false statement with the victim’s compensation manager who was called to the Defendant to verify the accident more specifically.

However, since the Defendant was disqualified on April 21, 2007 and was in the state of non-license at the time of the accident, the Defendant was unable to receive insurance money from the victim due to the existence of the victim's reason for exemption.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 2,55,780 as insurance money from the victim around September 17, 2013 and around December 18, 2013.

B. On March 30, 2014, the Defendant received an accident from the victim company’s customer center by phone at a place where the location is unknown, and made a false statement to the effect that “the victim company’s compensation manager, who gets off the phone, was in charge of shocking other vehicles parked by driving the said vehicle at the E near the E located in the Silung City, 07:00, around March 30, 2014,” and that “the victim company’s compensation manager who gets off the phone, has a valid driver’s license.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the victim company’s compensation manager has a valid driver’s license.”

However, the above Lone Star Co., Ltd was insured on condition of two limited driving (the defendant and the defendant's wife), but not only the defendant but also the defendant's children actually driven the above Lone Star Co., Ltd., and the defendant was revoked on April 21, 2007.