logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.24 2013고단7337
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and four months at the Seoul Central District Court on September 3, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 10, 2011.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who has operated an E office located in Suwon City without a licensed real estate agent's qualification.

On October 1, 2006, the Defendant introduced the “long-term Development Project Area” purchase of a commercial building, which is a neighborhood living facility, in the area of the land development project of the area planned for the development of the Gwangju Bridge in Suwon-si, which is located in the Dong-dong at the time of Suwon-si, and falsely stated that the Defendant may obtain a right to sell a neighboring residential site from the Gyeonggi-do public corporation to newly build a commercial building, which is a neighborhood living facility, in the area of the area planned for the development of the Gwangju metropolitan city at the time of Suwon-si.”

At around 19:00 on December 11, 2006, the Defendant showed a false obstacle compensation agreement in the name of AK that he received compensation from the Gyeonggi-do local public corporation, and “AK received KRW 7,50,000 from the Gyeonggi-do public corporation as compensation for the amount of salary.” Since the above obstacle compensation agreement has become final and conclusive and the compensation has been paid, it is naturally a document that can be recognized the right to sell the land for neighborhood life in the emulative city from the Gyeonggi-do public corporation, and as the inside country has been processed with obtaining and processing all the power of representation from AK, it is said that AK purchases the right to purchase the land for taking measures for daily life in the emulative city in the emulative city.”

However, there is no fact that K has made a furnal in the district to be developed by the above Mine New City, and there is no fact that he has received 750,000 won as a compensation for the furnal from the Gyeonggi Local Public Corporation, and the defendant has the power of representation related to the sale of the right

arrow