The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the grounds that all of the charges in the instant case regarding the Defendant’s attempted sale and purchase of the Mepta and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

There is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles on the commencement of enforcement due to the sale of Metetrapers.

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, it did not state the grounds for appeal as to the guilty portion, nor did it state the grounds for objection in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.