logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고정681
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 11. 17. 22:15경 수원시 팔달구 권광로188번길35-2 나혜석거리 노점판매대 부근 노상에서, 술에 취해 아무런 이유 없이 오른발로 피해자 B(여, 41세)의 왼발을 1회 걷어차고, 이에 ‘아, 진짜’라고 말하고 쳐다보며 사과를 요구하는 피해자에게 “아, 씨발, 대단한 씨발 년 나셨네, 씨발 년아, 뭘 꼬라 봐! 이리와. 뭐, 어쩌려구, 확!”라고 말하고, 오른손을 들어 올려 피해자를 때릴 듯이 위협하여 폭행하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant (the defendant asserts that there is no danger that the defendant would see the victim's scam or scam on the scam of the victim. The victim, without any justifiable reason, made a consistent statement at an investigative agency that there was a threat to the victim as to the victim's scam, while walking the victim's left part once due to the defendant's scam, and taking the victim's scam, and taking the victim's scam, while taking the victim's scambling. The victim's statement is specific to the extent that it is not possible to not directly experience, but it is difficult to find natural scamscams or contradictory parts of the statement, and it is highly reliable in that there is no reason for the victim to gather the defendant. Ultimately, since the defendant's scambling of the victim as stated in its reasoning is sufficiently recognized, the defendant'

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow