beta
Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment with prison labor of two months, each of the defendants A and M shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.
Defendant
A and M, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On October 19, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on August 27, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 27, 2016.
Defendant
M on April 21, 2016, after being sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for fraud at the Cheongju District Court on April 21, 2016, the judgment was finalized on April 29, 2016.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendants’ co-principals conspired with the Defendants to receive and acquire a mobile phone throughout the NAN line, or to receive and obtain it by means of obtaining, “a loan is an employee of the lending company, and a loan will increase its business performance, and the loan will not be damaged by immediately repaying it.” As a result, the Defendants’ co-principals conspired to receive and borrow the loan from them.
On May 5, 2015, the Defendants sent and sent a victim’s O (the victim’s 20 years of age) and a message from the name of “P” or “P” through P” or “P” through P, and he he he he he he he he he he he he gets the victim to leave the lending company on or around June 5, 2015 according to the above public offering, Defendant B concluded that “it is necessary to have the lending company attend the lending company, and will terminate the lending later if he opens the mobile phone,” and on the same day, Defendant B received the above public offering after having the victim open two cell phoness (T, U) from the S store located in Kimcheon-si, and continued to receive it before the above public sale. Around June 9, 2015, Defendant B received the above public offering after having the victim open the mobile phone through the World store located in Kimcheon-si, and had the victim open the mobile phone to the above public store.
However, in fact, the defendants had a cellular phone opened in the name of the victim, and did not intend to pay the price to the victim.
As such, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above, and then deceiving the victim, up to June 5, 2015, the total market value of 1,716,00 mobile phones consisting of 1,716,000, and around June 9, 2015.