Plaintiff 1 and 8 others (Attorneys Kim Jong-hoon et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Minister of Education and Human Resources Development (Attorney Kim Jong-soo, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

July 22, 2004

1. All the lawsuits of plaintiffs 1, 2, and 3 shall be dismissed.

2. All claims of plaintiffs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

On February 4, 2004, the defendant issued an application for approval of taking office by the plaintiff 1, 2, and 3 against the non-party 1 school juristic person, and a disposition of cancellation of taking office by the plaintiff 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 on February 5, 2004, and a disposition of cancellation of taking office by the non-party 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 as temporary directors of the non-party 1 school juristic person, respectively.

1. Basic facts

The following facts may be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence Nos. 1-1 through 1-3, evidence Nos. 13-1 through 40-3, evidence Nos. 42-1 through 53-5, evidence Nos. 57-1, 58-1 through 11, evidence Nos. 60-1 through 68, evidence Nos. 71-2, 3, 73-1 through 29, evidence Nos. 73-1 through 5, and evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and evidence Nos. 9's testimony, and there is no counter-proof.

(a) The establishment of (name omitted) Arts Schools;

(1) At the time of March 191, 191, Nonparty 10 submitted an application for approval of a school establishment plan to establish the (name omitted) art university, which is a four-year university, to the Minister of literature delivery, but failed to obtain the approval, the non-party 10 obtained approval of a plan to establish the (name omitted) art school on November 30, 1991. The non-party 1 established the non-party 1 school for the operation of the above school on January 11, 1992. At that time, the non-party 1 owned the land of 90 in Yandong-dong, Yandong-dong, the land of 168-6, 48, 50, 50, 169-6 and each of the land of 168-6, 168-6, 168, 465, 56-6, 168, 56-56, 169-6, 168, and 168-6.

⑵ 소외 1 학교법인은 그 후 1992. 7. 30. (이름 생략)예술학교의 설립인가신청을 하였고, 교육부장관은 1992. 12. 23. ① 학교설립계획 승인신청시 제출한 시설·설비 등 교육여건의 연도별 확보계획을 충실히 이행할 것이며 여타 제반 교육여건도 교육법과 동법시행령 및 대학설치기준령이 정하는 교육여건 이상을 확보할 것, ②＇92. 12. 31.까지 교사(제1 예술관)완공, 체육장 완성과＇93. 2. 28.까지 공공시설 입지승인면적 중 미확보부지를 확보할 것, ③＇93년도 건축예정 교사 5,772㎡(제2 예술관)에 대한 소요경비 조달재산을 법인 명의로 확보할 것, ④ 위의 조건을 성실히 이행하지 아니하거나 설립인가 신청서에 허위사실이 발견된 때에는 설립인가 취소를 포함한 관계법령상에 의한 제재조치를 취할 수 있음을 유념할 것 등을 조건으로 하여 위 학교의 설립을 인가(갑 제1호증의 8)하였다.

The non-party 10 submitted a letter stating that the non-party 10, the non-party 10, in the process of the above establishment authorization, completed the application for school establishment plan with respect to the first art museum of the first art museum of the 192 phase of completion as the teacher, obtained the approval and promised to report it to the Ministry of Education by January 15, 1993 (Evidence 1-2) and that the non-party 1 should promise to contribute the real estate and cash owned to the non-party 1 to invest in the construction works of the art school (not omitted) (Evidence 1-4) and that if the above-owned property falls short of securing the above building, facilities and equipment, the non-party 10 submitted a letter stating that the non-party 1 will contribute to the investment of the proceeds from the lease of the other building in the above construction works (Evidence 1-7).

On January 5, 1993, the Minister of Education urged the non-party 1 school juristic person to submit a report on the increase in the capital of the procurement property for the expenses incurred in securing remaining facilities as soon as possible. On April 30, 1993, the non-party 1 school juristic person made a disposal of the land (detailed 1 omitted) as its basic property, each of the land in Daegu-gu (detailed 2 omitted) and the above (detailed 3 omitted) with the basic property as the expenses for the construction of the second art museum, and the land in the above (detailed 1,181,623,305 won as the corporate monetary trust property deposited at the Daegu Central Branch of the Japanese Bank, and reported the increase in the capital to the Minister of Education (Evidence 4-1), and thereafter, made a disposal of the disposal property to the non-party 1’s basic property, and made a disposal of the property to the non-party 1’s general property at least the amount of the property sold to the non-party 1’s general property.

(b) School building works;

(1) The non-party 1’s educational foundation entered into a contract with the company to newly build the Arts Center 1, the Arts Center 2, and the Private Practice Center (No. 5-3) (No. 5-1-6-5-2) in its name with the same content as the attached construction contract and construction work status, and entered into a contract with the non-party 1’s joint guarantor of the non-party 1’s educational foundation, the contractor, to newly build the humanities (No. 4-2) as the joint guarantor of the non-party 1’s non-party 1’s non-party 1’s non-party 1’s house, and each of the above buildings was completed on the date indicated in the “Date of Completion” (hereinafter “each of the above construction works”).

D. Each of the instant construction costs was paid as indicated in Appendix 2, 30, 100 won for construction work; KRW 12,028,800 for interest; KRW 12,400 for the founder or non-party 1 school foundation; KRW 4,454,300 for the total construction cost; KRW 00 for the 0-year revised supplementary budget for the 000-year interest rate for the 0000-year interest rate for the 0000-year interest rate for the 0000-year interest rate for the 000-year interest rate; KRW 90 for the 00-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate; KRW 90 for the 00-year interest rate for the 190-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate for the 190-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate for the 00-year interest rate for the 9040-year interest rate for each.

(c) Establishment of the National University of Arts (name omitted);

(1) On September 11, 1996, Nonparty 1 applied to the Minister of Education for the authorization of the establishment of the National University of Arts (name omitted) and submitted a certificate of examination and inspection (Evidence A No. 10-2) on September 19, 1996. The documents submitted by Nonparty 1 on the above documents include a written confirmation of payment of construction expenses and a statement of securing financial resources to cover the payment of construction expenses in addition to the construction contract in addition to the construction contract. However, Nonparty 1, in the above examination and inspection table, the “building construction contract inspection table” was written in the “A teacher construction contract inspection table” and was completed after the contract was entered into, or was under, the construction contract was completed, or was under the construction contract. Nonparty 1 paid 1,924,50,000 won to the company in the calculation of the construction price of each of the above buildings, 4,172,600,000 won as a result, the unpaid construction price was not paid in full from 00,000 won.

⑵ 교육부장관은 1996. 10. 26. 소외 1 학교법인에게 제1 예술관, 제2 예술관, 개인연습실, 식당·휴게소, 정수장의 총 연면적 14,618㎡와 교지를 대학설립 심사시까지 확보하여 보고할 것과 (이름 생략)예술학교 폐지인가신청서 및 정관변경인가신청서를＇96. 11. 20.까지 제출하도록 할 것 등을 조건으로 소외 1 학교법인의 정관 중 그가 설치·경영하는 학교를 (이름 생략)예술대학교로 변경하는 정관변경을 인가하였고, 1996. 12. 11.에는 교육기본시설 등 제반 교육시설여건은 관련 법령 등이 정하는 바에 따라 확보·유지토록 할 것 등의 여러 조건과 위 조건을 성실히 이행하지 아니하거나 대학설립인가 신청서에 허위사실이 발견된 때에는 대학설립인가의 취소 등의 조치를 취할 것이라는 조건 하에 (이름 생략)예술대학교의 설립을 인가하였으며, 소외 1 학교법인은 위 설립인가에 기하여 1997. 3. 1. 개교한 이래 (이름 생략)예술대학교를 경영하고 있다.

(d) Details of the disposition;

(1) The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff 1, 2, and 3 obtained the approval of their inauguration from the defendant, and the plaintiff 4 was established from February 23, 2001; the plaintiff 5 was established from the non-party 1 school foundation; the plaintiff 6 was appointed or reappointed from April 2001; the plaintiff 7 was a person who was appointed or reappointed from February 5, 1998; the plaintiff 8, and 9 were an auditor; the plaintiff 1 was a person who was employed as an auditor; the plaintiff 1, 2, and 3 was an auditor at the meeting of the board of directors held on October 21, 2003; and the non-party 1 applied for the approval of his appointment to the defendant on the same day.

B. From April 7, 2003 to the 19th day of the same month, the Defendant discovered the total of 30 illegal and unfair matters, including the negligence of duties by the executives of Nonparty 1 school juristic persons, the disposal of profit-making property, the illegal disposal of profit-making property, the illegal employment of the executive officers of Nonparty 1, the improper employment of the president of the National University of Arts, the improper employment of teachers, the improper employment of teachers, and the execution of school expenses accounts.

On July 1, 2003, the defendant pointed out the following illegal and unfair matters with respect to the non-party 1 school juristic person (the result of comprehensive audit) and demanded the non-party 1 school juristic person to take the social status, administrative and financial measures with respect to the officers and employees of the non-party 1 school juristic person and (name omitted) teaching staff of the (non-party 1) art university until August 30, 203, but again requested the non-party 1 school juristic person to implement the corrective measures after July 15, 2003 and submit the result to the defendant until August 30, 2003, and the defendant demanded that the non-party 1 school juristic person take the measures such as cancellation of the approval of taking office by the above date.

【Comprehensive Audit Results】

(A) Failure of duty of a corporation officer

- The directors and auditors of the non-party 1 school foundation shall be negligent in performing their duties in relation to each unlawful or unjust matter set forth in the preceding 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 14, 17, and 20.

(B) Unfair disposition of basic property for profit;

-use of deposits for profit, which are profit-making assets, without resolution of the Council and permission of the competent authorities, 757,214,000 won;

-in addition to the Gyeongdong-gun, a real estate for educational purposes, (number 1 omitted), 254,820 square meters of forest land as basic property for profit without permission from the competent authorities for change of use;

(C) a person who has been automatically discharged from his office;

-work continuously on the part of the non-party 10 (the president at that time), the non-party 11 (the secretary at that time), and the non-party 12 (students at that time) whose sentence of suspended sentence of imprisonment has become final and conclusive due to criminal trials, etc., on the part of the articles of incorporation of the non-party 1 school foundation

(d) improper means to convene the board of directors of a school foundation

-the convening of the Council shall be notified six times in total without settlement of the chairperson or without complying with written and verbal notice time limits;

(e) An improper disposal of rental deposit for profit;

-one hundred million,00,000 won out of the security deposits for profit, which shall be separately managed for the purpose of obtaining good appraisal in the comprehensive university evaluation in 2001, shall be executed with the ordinary cost of transfer at the University of Arts, which shall be the school expense account (name omitted), from among the security deposits for profit,

(f) improper to appoint (name omitted) President of the National University of Arts.

-To appoint Plaintiff 5 as President of the National University of Arts (name omitted) in a society (hereinafter referred to as "President of the National University of Arts") held on August 29, 2001, over 65 years of age for teachers;

(G) improper execution of business promotion expenses for corporate accounting

-24,428,00 won in aggregate of corporate business promotion expenses by using corporate cards without specific material in advance for the enforcement purpose, etc., in improper way.

(h) improper management of rent for university cafeterias;

- Nonparty 1’s educational foundation unfairly uses the amount of KRW 59,727,00 from September 1, 2001 to April 2003 as corporate operating funds, out of the proceeds from the lease of cafeterias and vending machines in universities, which should be used as revenue in school expenses accounts.

(i) One special employee of a visual design who does not meet the requirements for special employment.

(j) Amendment to the regulation on the evaluation of the teaching profession as amended on September 1, 2002 is unreasonable.

(k) improper appointment of a teacher;

-one of the three major subjects such as the fashion Design on March 1, 2002, and two major subjects such as the Order Design on March 1, 2003 and the Order on March 1, 2003, it will deal with the affairs of appointment in an improper manner by unilaterally determining and employing new teachers at the school administration without a comprehensive review, such as the rate of securing teachers and the request for the department, etc.

(l) From April 1, 200 to April 1, 2003, the appointment of 20 teachers and the appointment of 10 associate professors from April 1, 200 to April 1, 200, and the appointment of 198 associate professors from other universities, such as the appointment of 10 associate professors from other universities.

(m) Unfair requests for disciplinary actions against teachers

-In accordance with the fact-finding report on the fact-finding report that was made up of November 26, 2002 for the resolution of civil petitions by the fact-finding committee, which did not undergo sufficient investigation process, for non-party 9 professor of the Arts University, only minor facts shall be investigated, and for non-party 13, non-party 14, and non-party 15, it shall unfairly deal with teachers disciplinary actions, such as requesting a decision on severe disciplinary action after conducting a timely investigation for students.

(n) Illegal spending of school expenses accounts;

-12,028,800,000 (including interest of KRW 20,00,000) of the total construction cost for each of the instant construction works, which are school facilities, as well as KRW 4,454,30,000 of the amounts to be borne by the founders and the corporate accounts, and KRW 500,000 of the amounts to be borne by the private school promotion foundation after March 1997, plus KRW 7,074,50,500,000, excluding the total amount of KRW 4,954,30,000,000, from the accounts of school expenses;

(o) Payment of excessive remuneration for absences from office due to criminal punishment;

- Nonparty 11 and Nonparty 10, the former president and the former president, who are detained for the crime of taking property in breach of trust and absent from office for reasons such as being tried, do not reduce the amount of each salary and pay the excessive amount of salary.

(p) Management neglect, such as personnel records cards and personnel issuance records;

-domination of personnel management tasks, without arranging personal personnel record cards, such as leaving alone, keeping various necessary documents related to the appointed persons prior to 200, keeping of the personnel record records, failing to enter some matters of appointment in the personnel record book, implementing a salary class without issuing a salary class, utilizing computerized data not verified in the course of computerization of personnel affairs;

(q) to amend the Regulations on Remuneration of Teachers and Employees;

-in amending the Regulations on Remuneration of Staff for Three occasions, such procedures as may be required by the Articles of Incorporation as may be approved by the Council shall not be implemented;

(r) improper execution of business promotion expenses

-in relation to the use of indirect official business expenses by the Secretary General, the student director, the planning director, and the school secretary General, they shall be executed without specific principles and standards of use.

(s) Unfair payment of travel expenses and use of them for other purposes;

-the amount which Nonparty 12 has been unjustly paid for a private purpose during a business trip with more than three occasions by the Secretary-General, for any other private purpose.

(t) Failure to disclose the settlement of accounts, such as disclosure and settlement of accounts;

(u) improper means to purchase books

- (name omitted) The Art University is merely 0.78 percent of the cost of purchase of books from the fiscal year 2000 to the fiscal year 2002, and the method of purchase of books was also improper, and most books are left neglected in terms of utilization.

(v) unjust conduct of giving credits, such as awarding a bachelor’s degree to graduates short of credits;

(w) After deciding that a graduate graduate graduate deferred at the Student Disciplinary Committee, it unfairly deals with the school affairs by granting a degree certificate to the fact that it does not violate school regulations at the Fact-finding Committee.

(x) a full-time teacher without the prior approval of the president shall be admitted to another university.

(y) settle accounts with designated donations and scholarships other than deposits in order to increase the scholarship ratio of the student loans provided by the Korea Science Promotion Foundation;

(z) amend the regulations on scholarship payments without deliberation by the scholarship committee and make improper operations, such as making duplicate payments of scholarships;

(aa)An improper execution of informatization project costs, etc., such as entering into a negotiated contract at the time of a contract for computer program development services and facility construction subject to a general competitive tender and payment without inspection;

(zb) improper reflection of the results of university admission;

(C) any change in the installation of a facility and unfair construction

-the unit price, modified finishing materials, modified quantities, etc. of the modification work at the time of design modification shall be applied in an improper manner and the construction section shall be different from or mistakenly constructed in terms of design.

(o) A false tender is prepared as if a public tender had been conducted even though the contractor had already been determined in advance at the time of the construction of the school landscaping construction contract and the unfair-laving construction work and the installation of the playground parking lot, and there are different or excessive parts of the design design in the execution.

【Requirements for Correction】

(b) related - Measures to reinstate 757,214,00 won of basic property for profit disposed of without the licence of the competent authorities;

(c) POE. - Necessary measures shall be taken against persons subject to ipso facto retirement in accordance with the relevant provisions.

(d) Do- prepare and implement a normal operational plan of the board of directors of the school foundation.

(e)An amount of KRW 100,000,000, which is a non-party 1’s basic property for profit-making purposes, shall be compensated by the non-party 1’s educational foundation.

(f) POE.- To take necessary measures in accordance with the articles of incorporation of the non-party 1 school foundation.

(h) relating to paragraph (h)-transfer of 59,727,000 won of rental earnings, other than value-added tax, to the accounts of school expenses.

(n)An amount of 6,484,50,000 won, excluding 590,000,000 won, out of the construction cost of each of the construction works of this case illegally spent from the accounts of school expenses, shall be the revenue from the corporate accounts of the amount of 5,484,50,000 won.

(q) LOBE. - The school personnel remuneration regulations shall be amended and implemented in compliance with the procedures prescribed in the articles of incorporation of the school foundation of Nonparty 1.

(t)A plan to perform normal audit duties in relation to paragraph (t)-Settlement of Accounts, etc. shall be formulated and shall be made available for a substantial audit.

⑷ 소외 1 학교법인은 이 사건 감사결과에 대하여 시정요구사항을 이행하였다면서 2003. 9. 19. 증빙자료를 갖추어 시정결과를 피고에게 보고하였고, 2003. 9. 29. 이 사건 감사결과 지적사항에 대한 시정요구 이행 결과 보고서를 제출하였으며, 다만 위 지적사항 중 교비회계 집행 부당에 대하여 다투면서 국민고충처리위원회에 제출한 고충민원서에 대한 의결결과에 따라 이행하고자 한다는 건의를 하였고, 피고는 다시 위 시정요구사항 중 일부를 미이행하거나 보완하여야 함을 사유로 소외 1 학교법인에게 2003. 10. 28. 위 시정요구사항 중 일부 사항에 관하여 시정하거나 보완할 것을 명하면서, 위 기일까지 미이행시 사립학교법 제20조의 2 에 기하여 임원취임승인 취소 등의 조치를 취할 것이라면서 그 이행을 촉구하였으며, 소외 1 학교법인은 2003. 11. 19. 다음 [시정결과]와 같이 피고에게 종합감사결과 지적사항에 대한 시정요구 이행 결과보고(갑 제33호증)를 하였으나, 피고는 2003. 12. 6. 위 결과보고 중 ㈏항 관련 시정결과가 교비회계에서 법인회계로 불법전출로 인해 이루어진 것이라면서 제대로 시정할 것 등을 요구하는 등 미흡한 부분이 있어 감사결과 지적사항에 대한 시정을 요구하였고, 2003. 12. 29.에 다시 종합감사 결과 지적받은 위법·부당사항 중 미이행사항을 조속히 이행할 것과 이행 완료하지 못하는 사항에 대하여는 그 사유와 구체적인 추진계획을 2004. 2. 28.까지 제출하여 줄 것을 통지하였다.

【Correction Results】

(b) IN GENERAL....-Measures taken to collect from the accounts of school tuition on September 19, 2003 the amount of KRW 757,214,000 from the accounts of school tuition to revenue for the accounts of the corporation.

(C) LOBE. - Of those who are subject to ipso facto retirement, Nonparty 11 shall be retired on September 18, 2003, and Nonparty 12 shall be reappointed to and continue to serve as a reason for disqualification.

(D) LAWIT ACT. 4 December 2003. Establishment of board of directors operating rules

(e) REDORY. - Measures to preserve the shortage amount of 100,000,000 won by free contribution from the directors of the Plaintiff 4 on September 19, 2003 to the corporate passbook.

(h)Any measure to transfer gold 4,727,00 won, excluding gold 15,00,000 won, that has been previously transferred out of gold 59,727,000 won, to the accounts of school expenses.

(v) On the other hand, on October 21, 2003, Nonparty 1 held a board of directors and passed a resolution on the re-election of Plaintiff 1 and Plaintiff 3 and 2, who are the chief director and directors, who will be expected to expire on the 23th of the same month. On the same day, he received each written acceptance from the above plaintiffs and applied for the approval of the appointment of the defendant. However, on the 28th of the same month, the defendant notified Nonparty 1 that he reserved the appointment of an executive officer of the above Nonparty 1, on the ground that the above corrective measures have not been implemented.

⑹ 이러한 일련의 과정에서 소외 1 학교법인은 교비회계에서 불법지출된 이 사건 각 건축공사대금 중 금 6,484,500,000원을 법인회계에서 교비회계로 세입조치하지 아니하였음은 물론, 시정에 응할 의사로 그 이행계획서를 제출하는 등의 노력도 하지 아니하자, 피고는 2004. 2. 4. 위 종합감사결과 교비회계 집행 부당 등 사립학교법 위반사례가 지적되어 시정요구를 받았고 미이행시 임원취임승인취소가 계고되었음에도 위 시정요구사항을 미이행하였다는 사유로, 위에서 본 바와 같이 이사장 겸 이사 내지 이사로서 취임승인이 유보되었던 원고 1, 3, 2의 각 임원취임승인신청을 반려(갑 제39호증)하였으며, 소외 1 학교법인의 이사인 원고 5, 7, 6, 4와 감사인 원고 8, 9에 대하여 종합감사결과의 위법·부당사항 중 ㈛항의 교비회계를 부당 집행한 행위는 위 임원들의 직무 태만 내지 동조하에 이루어진 명백한 사립학교법 위반이라는 사유를 들어 각 사립학교법 제20조의 2 에 기하여 임원취임승인을 취소(갑 제40호증의 1, 2)하였고, 사립학교법 제25조 의 규정에 기하여 소외 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8을 소외 1 학교법인의 임시이사로 임명하는 처분(갑 제40호증의 3)을 하였다(이하, 위 임원취임승인반려처분을 ‘이 사건 반려처분’이라 하고, 위 임원취임승인취소처분을 ‘이 사건 승인취소처분’이라 하며, 위 임시이사선임처분을 ‘이 사건 임시이사선임처분’이라 하고, ‘이 사건 승인취소처분’과 ‘이 사건 임시이사선임처분’만을 ‘이 사건 각 처분’이라 한다).

2. Determination on this safety defense

(1) The defendant's assertion

The other party to the disposition of this case and the provisional director appointment disposition of this case are the non-party 1 school juristic person, and the standing to sue is also the non-party 1 school juristic person, but the lawsuit of revocation of the disposition of this case filed by the plaintiff 1, Kim Jong, and plaintiff 2, and the lawsuit of revocation of the provisional director appointment disposition of this case filed by the plaintiffs shall be dismissed as it is illegal and unjust.

D. Judgment on the lawsuits filed by Plaintiffs 1, 3, and 2

Even a third party, who is not the direct counter-party to an administrative disposition, has a legal interest in seeking revocation of the administrative disposition, standing to sue is recognized. However, legal interest refers to a case where there is a direct and specific interest protected by the law based on the pertinent disposition, but it does not include indirect or factual interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Nu14664, Dec. 26, 1995). Even if there was a resolution to appoint directors of the non-party 1 school foundation (including the chief director) with respect to this case, it cannot be legally effective, and even if the defendant rejected the disposition in this case, it cannot be said that the above plaintiffs suffered infringement of rights or legal disadvantage due to the above disposition. However, even if the above disposition was rejected, the above plaintiffs were not the party eligible to seek revocation of the rejection disposition, since the director's appointment cannot be revoked by the decision of the non-party 1 foundation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Du13684, Mar. 20, 2019).

Abstract Judgment on the part on which Plaintiff 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (hereinafter referred to as “Issk Plaintiffs”) sought revocation of the provisional director appointment disposition of this case

The provisional director selection and appointment disposition is conducted by the Minister of Education when a school juristic person fails to fill or fill the vacancy of directors and the purpose of the school juristic person concerned is unable to achieve or is likely to cause damage. As such, the cancellation disposition of the approval of taking office and the cancellation disposition of the appointment of provisional director are revoked by a judgment, etc. as a separate disposition, and the above provisional director appointment disposition is not revoked as a matter of course, or it is not invalidated as a matter of course (see Supreme Court Decision 90Nu5313, May 28, 1991). Thus, as in this case, it is a principle to seek revocation of the provisional director appointment disposition separately. In this case, where a temporary director appointment disposition is conducted because a vacancy occurs in a school juristic person due to the cancellation disposition of the appointment approval for the remaining plaintiffs who are officers, and no further fill the vacancy, the provisional director appointment disposition and the provisional director appointment disposition are closely related to the cancellation disposition, and in this case, if such cancellation is revoked, the remaining plaintiffs' interests are not related to the above provisional director's cancellation disposition.

3. Determination on the legitimacy of each of the dispositions of this case

A. The remaining plaintiffs' assertion

The remaining plaintiffs seek revocation of each of the dispositions of this case on the following grounds.

(1) If cancellation or withdrawal of a beneficial administrative act is made, the reason must be clearly stipulated by the law and the administrative agency should not allow excessive discretion. However, Article 20-2(1)1 and 2 of the Private School Act, which served as the basis for the revocation of the approval, cannot be specified as the elements of the above, is unconstitutional against the principle of clarity required by the Constitution. Thus, the revocation of the approval of the instant provisional directors under each of the above provisions, is null and void, and the disposition of revocation of the approval is also unlawful.

According to Article 23(1) of the Luxembourg Administrative Procedures Act, an administrative agency shall, in principle, present the grounds and reasons for the disposition to the parties. The revocation of the approval of the instant disposition is erroneous in the procedure that does not clearly state the grounds and grounds for the disposition.

Article 13(2)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Private School Act, Article 54 subparag. 7 of the Enforcement Decree of the Private School Act provides that the Defendant’s disposition of cancellation of the approval shall be deemed to include the amount of KRW 6,484,50,000, which was paid by Nonparty 11 and Nonparty 16, after deducting KRW 590,00,00, which was paid by the Defendant for the building construction work of the National University of Arts 7,000, KRW 6,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 7,000 which was paid by Nonparty 1 and Nonparty 16, and KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 7,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 60,000, KRW 7,00,00.

In fact, even if the defendant's corrective measures are all lawful, the total amount disbursed from this school expenses account was invested in school expenses expenses, there was no scambling or embling school expenses, and the government's participation in the operation of the private university due to the improper execution of the school expenses accounts by the non-party 1 school foundation and the (name omitted) art university's school affairs management, etc. is unlawful since it infringes on the freedom of learning and arts guaranteed by the Constitution and the autonomy of private school, and it is practically impossible to revenue the above amount as school expenses accounting within a short period because the amount of revenue measures exceeds 6.4 billion won due to the lack of the amount of revenue measures for school expenses accounting. In light of the above execution process, use, the necessity of private school autonomy and national interference, the proper method of demanding corrective measures, etc., the cancellation of the approval in this case is an error of law that deviates from and abused the discretion.

(v)the revocation of the approval of this case should be revoked in an unlawful manner. Accordingly, the provisional director appointment disposition of this case on this premise should also be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. Relevant statutes

Attached Form 4 is as shown in the relevant statutes.

C. Determination

(i) Whether Article 20-2(1)1 and (2) of the Private School Act is unconstitutional

Article 1 of the Private School Act provides that the purpose of promoting the sound development of private schools is to secure their independence and promote their public nature in light of the special characteristics of private schools. Article 20-2 (2) of the same Act provides that the revocation of the approval of taking office under paragraph (1) of the same Article shall be limited to the case where the competent agency fails to comply with it even after 15 days have elapsed from the date on which the competent agency requested the correction thereof. In particular, Article 1 (1) 2 of the same Act provides that "where the purpose of establishment of the relevant school juristic person is not achieved," due to disputes between executives, accounting fraud, and significant unjust practices." Considering the legislative purpose of Article 1 of the Private School Act as well as Article 20-2 of the same Act, the above provisions of the Private School Act also provide that the competent agency is able to sufficiently predict how the competent agency would revoke the approval of taking office under the above Act, and the defendant, who is the competent agency, can not be seen as being in violation of the principle of clarity and application of the Act.

She Whether the cancellation of the disposition of this case is procedural illegality

(a) Article 20-2(2) of the Private School Act provides that the revocation of the approval of taking office under paragraph (1) shall be limited to the case where the competent agency fails to comply with it even after 15 days have elapsed from the date on which it requested the school juristic person to correct the reasons therefor. As such, the defendant should have stated in the disposition that the school juristic person did not comply with the request of correction within the above period, in addition to the statement of unlawful and unjust matters of the officers (Supreme Court Decision 2001Du7138 delivered on February 5, 2002).

㈁ 이 사건에 관하여 보건대, 피고가 2003. 7. 1. 이 사건 종합감사결과(갑 제14호증의 1)를 통보함에 있어 위 ‘종합감사결과’의 위법·부당사항 중 ㈎항의 법인 임원의 직무 태만 사항에서 ㈛항 교비회계 집행 부당의 사항 등과 관련하여 이사인 원고 4, 5, 6, 7에 대하여는 사립학교법 제19조 제3항 등에 의한 이사의 직무 태만을, 감사인 원고 8, 9에 대하여는 사립학교법 제19조 제4항 , 소외 1 학교법인 정관 제25조에 기한 감사의 직무태만의 점을 적시하였고, 이 사건 승인취소처분의 처분서(갑 제40호증의 1, 2)에는 피고가 소외 1 학교법인에 대하여 종합감사결과의 위법·부당사항 중 ㈛항 교비회계 부당 집행의 사항에 대하여 2003. 8. 30.까지 (이름 생략)예술대학교의 교비회계에서 부당 집행한 이 사건 각 건축공사대금 6,484,500,000원을 교비회계에 세입조치하라는 시정요구를 하는 등 3차례에 걸쳐 계고하였음에도 미이행하였음과 이로 인하여 사립학교법 제20조의 2 등에 근거하여 임원취임승인을 취소한다고 적시하였는바, 비록 이 사건 임원승인취소처분서에 그 취소 사유와 근거 법령 일부를 구체적으로 명시하지 아니하였다 하더라도 앞서 든 사정에 비추어 보면 위 처분서에 적시된 정도의 이유제시로써 이 사건 승인취소처분의 처분사유, 즉 사립학교법 제20조의 제1항 제1호 , 제2항 에 기한 ‘임원취임승인취소사유의 존재와 그에 대한 시정요구 불이행’은 충분히 특정되었다고 봄이 상당하여, 이 사건 승인취소처분에 절차적인 위법이 있음을 전제로 하는 나머지 원고들의 위 주장은 이유 없다.

•Judgment on the lawfulness of the cancellation of the instant disposition

㈎ 교비회계 부당집행과 관련한 시정명령의 적법 여부

(이름 생략)예술대학교의 교사인 이 사건 각 건축공사의 대금 중 금 7,097,100,000원을 위 대학교의 교비회계에서 지출한 행위는 위법한 것인지에 관하여 보건대, ① 사립학교법 제29조 와 사립학교법시행령 제13조 및 소외 1 학교법인의 정관 제9조 등에 의하면 학교법인의 회계는 학교회계와 법인회계로 구분되고 학교회계 중 특히 교비회계에 속하는 수입은 학교가 학생으로부터 징수하는 입학금·수업료 등으로 이루어지는 결과 다른 회계에 전출하거나 대여할 수 없는 등 그 용도가 엄격히 제한되는 점, ② 사립학교법시행령 제13조 의 규정에 의하면, 교비회계에서 학교교육에 필요한 시설·설비를 위한 경비를 지출할 수 있지만, 앞서 살펴본 관련 규정에 의하면 교비회계에서 교육시설의 공사비를 부담하게 되는 경우는 당해 년도 또는 다음 년도에 새로이 학교시설 등을 짓는 경우 학교 구성원들과의 합의 아래 추가 시설확보의 필요성, 예산부담의 가능성 및 예산조달방법 등에 대한 종합적인 검토하에 위 공사자금에 대한 예산을 편성하여 예산·결산자문위원회의 자문을 거쳐 학교법인 이사회의 의결을 받아야 하고 사후에 피고에게 보고하여야 하며, 그 집행도 위 예산범위 내에서 교비집행 책임자인 학교의 장이 계약을 체결한 후 지출을 하여야 하는데( 사립학교법 제29조 제4항 , 소외 1 학교법인 정관 제9조 제3항 등 참조), 앞서 인정한 각 사실에 의하면 (이름 생략)예술대학교의 설립 이후 위 대학교가 주체가 되어 체결된 인문관(제4예술관) 증축공사 등과는 달리 학교법인인 소외 1 학교법인이 계약당사자인 도급인으로서 이 사건 각 공사계약을 체결한 것이고, 소외 10 또는 소외 1 학교법인은 위 공사대금의 재원 조달에 대한 고려 없이 일방적으로 그 설치·경영하는 (이름 생략)예술학교 또는 (이름 생략)예술대학교가 설립되기 이전에 위와 같은 계약을 체결하여 과다한 시설을 한 후 이 사건 각 건축공사의 수급인들에게 지급하지 못한 공사대금을 사후적으로 교비회계의 예산에 편성하고 관할청의 허가 하에 사학진흥재단에서 융자를 받은 것에 불과하여, 교비회계에서 지급한 이 사건 각 건축공사대금은 학교교육에 필요한 시설·설비를 위한 경비의 지급으로 판단할 수 없고 단지 기발생한 채무금의 변제로서의 성격을 가지는 점, ③ 더구나 학교법인과 학교의 회계를 건전하게 운영하기 위하여 지출은 금융기관의 수표로써 행하거나 예금통장에 의하여 행하여야 한다고 규정되어 있는 등 관할청에서는 원칙적으로 학교시설 등의 공사 완공 후 교비로 공사비를 분할지급하는 내용의 계약을 체결하지 못하게 하고 있고, 교비회계에서 지급하는 공사의 시행과 관련하여 공사자금이 제대로 확보되어 있지 아니한 경우 관할청으로부터 채무부담 행위에 대한 허가를 받아서 사학진흥재단 또는 금융기관 등으로부터 금원을 차입하여 공사대금을 지급한 후 교비회계에서 그 차입금을 상환하는 방법에 의하여야 하는 점, ④ 이 사건 각 건축공사에 의하여 신축된 각 건물이 (이름 생략)예술대학교의 교사로 사용되고 있기는 하지만, 소외 1 학교법인의 존립 목적이 (이름 생략)예술대학교(그 설립 이전에는 (이름 생략)예술학교)의 설치·경영을 그 목적으로 하고 있는 점 등에 비추어 위의 사정만으로 이 사건 각 건축공사대금을 교비회계에서 지출할 수 있는 근거가 될 수 없는 점, ⑤ 구 교육법시행령(1997. 2. 28. 대통령령 제15299호로 개정되기 전의 것) 제55조 는 사립학교 설립의 인가를 받고자 하는 자는 경비와 유지방법, 설비와 설립자가 법인인 때에 기부행위 또는 정관과 등기 및 기부금 등에 관한 증빙서류 및 설립자가 자연인인 때에는 그 이력서와 경비 지불능력에 대한 증빙서류 등을 설립인가기관에 제출하여야 하도록 규정하고 있고, 관련 규정에 의하면 사립학교의 설립신청시 교사건축계획 등은 물론이고 소요경비조달계획서와 설립자의 재산명세서 및 재산확보계획서 또는 대학재정운영계획을 기재한 설립계획서를 제출하도록 규정되어 있으며, 앞서 인정한 바와 같이 이 사건의 경우에도 (이름 생략)예술학교의 설립시 그 설립신청서상 공사예정이던 제2 예술관의 공사대금 재원으로 설립자인 소외 10 등 소유이던 수익용 부동산 중 일부를 특정하여 기재하고 있을 뿐 아니라 위 부동산을 소외 1 학교법인에 무상출연하여 위 예술학교의 건축공사에 투자하겠다는 각서와 위 공사대금이 부족할 경우에는 소외 10 소유의 임대수익에서 이를 지불할 것이라는 내용의 각서까지 받았으며, 갑 제10호증의 1, 2의 각 기재에 의하면, (이름 생략)예술대학교의 설립시 소외 1 학교법인이 제출한 대학설립인가신청서나 설립인가 심사점검표에는 교사확보명세서 등과 시설확충계획까지 기재하게 되어 있고, 교사건축과 관련하여 공사계약서는 물론이고 공사비 미지급금이 있는 경우 그 확인서와 재원 확보 은행잔액증명서 등 공사비 미지급금 재원 확보 명세서까지 제출하도록 되어 있으면서, 수익용 기본재산과 연간소득은 증빙서류를 확보할 수 있는 것에 한하여 자세하게 기재하도록 되어 있으며, 소요자금조달 계획서와 관련된 소요자금조달 점검표에는 교육용 출연재산과 수익용출연재산으로 나누어 출연자명단 및 출연재산을 기재하도록 되어 있는데, 소외 1 학교법인은 대구대학교 설립인가 신청시 이미 착공된 상태로서 거의 완성 단계에 있거나 시공 중이던 인문관과 연구동의 건물을 누락한 채 제1 예술관, 제2 예술관, 개인연습실만을 기재하면서, 위 각 건물의 공사대금 중 합계 금 7,097,100,000의 공사대금이 미지급된 상태였음에도 불구하고 그 공사대금 전액을 이미 지급하여 미지급액이 없다는 취지로 기재하여 소요자금 조달표란은 공란으로 되어 있었던 점 등을 종합하면, 원칙적으로 사립학교의 설립시 사립학교가 필요한 교사 등 시설물은 그 후 사립학교의 필요에 의하여 새로이 설치되는 시설물 등과는 달리 설립자 또는 학교법인이 그의 부담으로 설치하는 것을 전제로 한다 할 것이므로, 소외 1 학교법인과 각 공사시공자 사이에 체결된 이 사건 각 건축공사계약에 기한 것으로서 대구대학교 설립 이전에 이미 완공되었거나 시공 중이던 건물들의 공사대금의 지급의무는 소외 1 학교법인에 있다 할 것이다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 그 당시 이사 또는 감사의 직무에 있던 나머지 원고들이 직무를 태만히 하여 교비회계와 법인회계가 엄격히 구분되는 현행 법령의 체계하에서 위 공사대금 중 미지급된 금 7,097,100,000원을 교비회계에서 지급하게 한 행위는 위법하다 할 것이므로, 위 위법한 행위로 인한 위 금원 중 소외 11과 소외 16이 변상한 금 590,000,000원을 공제한 금 6,484,500,000원을 교비회계에 세입조치하라는 피고의 시정명령 또한 적법하다 할 것이다.

㈏ 시정요구 사항의 불이행

According to the facts acknowledged above, although the defendant's request for correction has been made more than once after July 1, 2003, it is clear that the non-party 1 failed to comply with all the matters requiring the return of 6,484,50,000 won out of the illegally spent construction costs from the school expenses accounts, which served as the basis for the revocation of the approval of the instant disposition, among the corrective measures, to the accounts of school expenses, so each disposition of this case is recognized as the grounds for the relevant disposition.

㈐ 재량권의 일탈·남용 여부

(a) The cancellation disposition of taking office under Article 20-2 of the Private School Act provides that "non-performance of the request for correction" as the ground for the disposition, and the issue of whether a punitive administrative disposition deviates from or abused from the scope of discretion under social norms shall be determined by comparing and comparing the degree of infringement of public interest and the disadvantage that an individual suffers due to the disposition (see Supreme Court Decision 2001Du7138, Feb. 5, 2002, etc.). Thus, the degree of illegality and illegality of "the result of the comprehensive audit" that the defendant did not consider as the ground for the original disposition or "matters requiring correction" that cannot be considered as the ground for the disposition of this case should not be considered in determining whether the disposition of this case is abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the issue of whether the disposition of this case, which is the ground for the disposition of this case, is unlawful as to the disposition of this case, based only on the contents of the violation, the non-performance of the request for correction and the remaining offenses committed by the plaintiffs.

(5) In this case, if the founder of the above private school or the above private school foundation establishes a private school, it shall be the most basic duty to contribute its own property to secure the school site and to construct teachers. It shall be strictly distinguished from the corporate accounting of this case and, in particular, it shall not be transferred or lent to other accounts, the extent of its illegality is excessive. ② The plaintiff 4, 5, 6, and 7 shall deliberate and decide on the matters concerning the school foundation's business as the director of the above school foundation and the matters delegated by the board of directors or the board of directors (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Du100888 delivered on June 1, 200). It shall not be deemed that the above school foundation did not take measures to correct or cancel the pertinent illegal acts, despite the fact that the non-party 1 and the director of the above private school foundation did not take measures to correct or cancel the pertinent illegal acts.

㈑ 소결론

Thus, the cancellation of the approval of the disposition of this case is without any error in its contents and procedures, and it is not illegal to deviate from and abuse its discretionary power.

m. Whether the provisional disposition of this case is legitimate

As seen earlier, there is no error of law in the revocation of the approval of the instant disposition, and thus, the instant disposition, which is sought on the premise that the disposition should be revoked illegally, shall be revoked, is without merit without examining further matters.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, all of the lawsuits of plaintiffs 1, 2, and 3 are dismissed, and each of the plaintiffs' claims seeking revocation is dismissed on the premise that each of the dispositions of this case is unlawful. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[The relevant Acts and subordinate statutes in the attached Form omitted]

Judges Cho Jae-young (Presiding Judge)