logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고단3395
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

3,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 3395] On September 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two months for violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Changwon District Court on September 24, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 27, 2014.

On April 2012, the Defendant came to know of the Internet NAV’s “C” page of the Internet NAV, and agreed to the amount of 3 to 50,000 won per mobile phone by allowing the customers recruited by the said TM company to subscribe to the mobile phone (hereinafter “E”), the name influence (hereinafter “G”), the name influence (hereinafter “G”) that the said TM company operates in Seoul F, and the name influence (hereinafter “G”) that it would operate the said TM company, and the H that it becomes aware of the said TM company’s identification card and the application for the mobile phone subscription to the said TM company, and delivered it to the said H at NE, and let the customers recruited by the said TM company subscribe to the mobile phone, and then agreed to the amount of 1 to 3,50,000 won per mobile phone.

On June 2012 or July 2012, the Defendant: (a) from E, G, and H, “TM employees want to provide loans to customers; or (b) employees opened a mobile phone with customers via a mobile phone, paid cash to them; and (c) has induced customers by paying the fee for using the Handphone for three months; and (d) had the customers walked that the Handphone was a click; and (c) on July 25, 2012, the Defendant transferred 91,080 won of the Handphone fee to I, the customer of the instant click to the said I account; and (d) had been aware of the fact that TM companies had induced customers by deception, the Defendant continued to engage in the Handphone opening business despite having been aware of the fact that TM companies had been inducing customers.

The Defendant and the staff J, around July 26, 2012, shall receive a copy of the victim L's identification card and a mobile phone subscription application, which the said TM company had taken by deception, from the said TM company, to the said H.

arrow