Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in the Southern District Court Branch of Seoul District Court on September 17, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 13, 2014

【Criminal Facts】

In 209, the Defendant, while operating a base station for mobile communications in 2009, received and stored a copy of the bank account in order to pay benefits to B, which was an employee, but did not destroy B’s identification card and a copy of the bank account even after the business was closed.

The defendant, who closed down his business and stolen the name of B which does not have a certain day, has subscribed to a mobile phone, has sold it as a used mobile phone, and has taken the mind to acquire the price by fraud.

1. On July 12, 201, the Defendant: (a) sent a phone call to the E mobile phone agency operated by D in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; and (b) stated, “If the Defendant sent an identification card and a copy of the passbook to Fax, he/she may not prepare an application for mobile phone membership; (c) prepare an application for membership in lieu of an application for membership; and (d) change by opening three Handphones in lieu of an application for membership.”

The Defendant sent to D a copy of the B resident registration certificate and a copy of the passbook of corporate bank bank by facsimile to D, and made D prepare a mobile phone number F, G, and H3 "portable telephone service contract" instead of "portable telephone service contract".

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the Chapter 3 of the “portable Call Service New Contract”, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant in the event of the foregoing investigation document is named as “I” in the D indictment in which the “Handphone service new contract”, which is a forged private document, is prepared by proxy, as described in the preceding paragraph, but is obvious that it is a clerical error and correct it ex officio.

In order to transmit the forgery to the SK Telecom employee who is not aware of the forgery, it was exercised by opening the cell phone through the cell phone.

3. Even if the accused opens a mobile phone, he/she shall pay for the mobile phone.