1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd., and C, each of whom was KRW 40,000,000;

B. Defendant B, C and each party, and Defendant G.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant Company is a company operating a power plant in I, J, K, L, M, and N. From November 201 to January 201, Defendant C was the representative director of the Defendant Company, Defendant E’s labor management team, Defendant H was the deputy head of the M&A from November 201 to December 201, Defendant D was the former head of the Defendant Company’s labor management task, Defendant G was the former head of the Defendant Company’s labor management task, and the latter was the latter head of the Defendant Company’s labor management task from January 3, 201 to December 2010.

B. The Plaintiff is a national industrial trade union established for five development companies, including the Defendant Company, and workers engaged in the development industry, and the Defendant Company is organized under the Plaintiff’s trade union. B headquarters consists of the headquarters branch, I branch, J branch, K branch, L branch, M branch, and N branch.

C. Some members of the Plaintiff Trade Union B’s headquarters organized a committee for promotion of the establishment of a company-level trade union around June 2010. On November 18, 2010, the Plaintiff Trade Union held a general meeting of members for resolution on the agenda of withdrawing the B headquarters from the Plaintiff Trade Union and changing it into a company-level trade union (hereinafter “instant general meeting”), but the said proposal was rejected.

On December 18, 2010, the members of the promotion committee for the establishment of a company-level trade union were to withdraw from the Plaintiff trade union and to establish a company-level trade union. On December 20, 2010, the general meeting of the B trade union, which is a company-level trade union, was held, and reported the establishment of a trade union to the Gangnam-gu branch office of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Agency.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Defendant Company led the members of the Plaintiff Trade Union to agree on the proposed change of organization at the instant general meeting, and as the proposed change of organization was rejected, disadvantageous personnel measures shall be taken against those members who do not withdraw from the Plaintiff Trade Union.