beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 10, 2001, Defendant C driven a D vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 14:00, and driven a road near the south-west - upper wing Terminal, Defendant C brought in the Plaintiff (E students and 10 years of age and 7 months of age at the time of the accident) by shocking the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant injury”).
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
On July 1, 2001, the Plaintiff received the diagnosis of the instant injury from the F Hospital on July 1, 2001, and was under the lap system on July 2, 2001 and under the lap system on July 4, 2001, and was under the lap system removal method and the lap control method on February 4, 2002.
C. B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) was an insurer who entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant vehicle, and paid the Plaintiff totaling KRW 14,973,370 to March 28, 2003 after the instant accident, and paid KRW 13,000,000 to the Plaintiff on March 28, 2003 (hereinafter “instant agreement”).
On August 3, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by G Hospital as “the innate change of the details of the site, the structural part of the frame, and the retirement.” On October 5, 2016, the Seoul National University Hospital was diagnosed as follows: “On the other hand, the Plaintiff was in need of the correction thirrosis and the correction thirrosis due to the misappropriation after the thring of the frame, and the string of the upper right due to the misappropriation.” On October 12, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants for compensation of the instant damages on the grounds of the nethal disorder caused by the instant accident.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, this court's H Hospital Head, and the results of the commission of physical examinations to I Hospital Head, and the results of fact inquiry, the purport of the entire pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim is attributable to the instant accident, which led to the Plaintiff’s occurrence of the instant accident, in turn, the instant case involving misappropriation, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., the