1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 2,00,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s objection thereto from September 29, 2012 to December 23, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff, as a dentist, sought payment from the Defendant of the summary of the case, that the Plaintiff did not receive part of the treatment costs.

In this regard, the defendant claims medical expenses and consolation money for reasons of the plaintiff's medical negligence, violation of duty of explanation, transitional observation, and non-performance of obligation to take measures, and claims the payment of the remaining amount of damages as a offset and counterclaim against the remaining medical expenses.

2. The plaintiff's progress of medical treatment for the defendant;

A. On June 4, 2010, the Defendant, who was admitted to the Cental Hospital operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”), was consulted on the treatment of the spawning.

At the time, as a result of the inspection of the state of the defendant's dental condition, the arrangement of upper and lower-water was severely distorted, and the total of the teaching was not good and the ging salt and the ging stone was very serious.

특히 피고의 윗턱은 정상적으로 기능하는 치아가 거의 없는 상태로서 잇몸뼈의 두께가 충분하지 않았기 때문에 모든 치아 위치에 임플란트를 식립하는 것은 불가능하다고 판단되었다.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff could minimize the scope of treatment and treatment as much as possible, and make it possible for the Defendant to normalize the Defendant’s Chewing function. In addition to the two existing marries (Ma25,26), it was difficult to establish three marries (Ma17, 14, and 21) in addition to the existing marries (Ma17, 14, and 21), and install a treatment plan with a total of five marries attached to the mar, with its support power.

In addition, the lower margin maintained the natural path of the front, while removing one (Ma36) of three existing left francing column, the rest of two (Ma35, 37) shall be replaced only by the yellow, and three (Ma46, 47) loss portion of the right francing three (Ma46, 47) shall be installed by planting two (Ma46, 47).

C. The plaintiff calculated the medical expenses for each item based on the above treatment plan and added them.