1. The Defendant: (a) 12/17 shares, 1/17 shares, 1/17 shares, and 1/17 shares, among the 655m2 in Yangju-si, to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. The facts of recognition are as follows: B, 655 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). At the time of the circumstance, the Gyeonggi-do Yangju-gun was 198 square meters prior to B, Yangju-gun, but E was F, the Yangju-gun was changed to the name of each administrative district, and the area conversion registration was made, and the same was changed as above) was written during the period of the Japanese occupation, and the land survey division was written in the land survey division in the Gyeonggi-do Yangju-gun G.

On April 7, 1952, K, the heir of the family and South Korea, solely succeeded to the property of the deceasedJ, as the two states of Gyeonggi-do, as the fleet I, as the fleet of the designated parties, died of the main J(H) in both states of Gyeonggi-do.

K married with L (the death of January 14, 1952) and succeeded to the property with the shares of N6/17, the plaintiff (the appointed party), the plaintiff (the designated party), D, and M (the death of October 2, 1954), and N on November 28, 1955, as K died on February 13, 1984, K succeeded to the property with the shares of N6/17, the plaintiff (the appointed party) A6/17, C1/17 (the shares of the plaintiff) and D4/17, and D4/17, and as N died on May 14, 1996, the shares of the above 6/17 shares were inherited by N, the survival model of N, the P 3/17, and the P 3/17, respectively.

After that, on December 2014, the plaintiff (Appointed Party) held O and P's shares in inheritance betweenO and P, and agreed on the division of inherited property by the plaintiff (Appointed Party).

On May 13, 1995, the defendant made a registration of preservation of ownership on the land of this case.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1 through 19 (including each number in case where there is a virtual number), the purport of the whole pleading

2. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the above facts of recognition and the quoted evidence, namely, the name of Han-gun, the title of the situation of the land in this case, and the name of Han-gun, the line of the designated parties, is equal to H, and in light of the fact that Q, G, R, and S were integrated into V in 1914, and part of Q, G, R, and L and U were integrated into V, the fact that the address of Yangju-gun, the title of which is the situation, the Gyeonggi-do Yangju-gun, the G and the designated parties, are the same village, and the land survey register is made up.