Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a real operator of C Co., Ltd. located in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

On June 24, 2012, around 10:40, the Defendant took part in the victim F(39 years of age), the victim G(32 years of age), and the victim H(42 years of age) on the roof of the E factory located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si, Inc., Ltd., and performed the replacement work of the discharge outlet installed on the rooftop of the above factory.

The location was a large place where discharged legacy and U.S. paints were generated while mobile phone painting work, and the replacement work of the car lapter is conducted using the electric laping, and the risk of fire due to the electric lap or electric lap. Therefore, the defendant has a duty of care to check electric wires, etc. in advance, and to prevent accidents caused by fire by being equipped with fire extinguishing and fire prevention equipment in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to install any fire extinguishing equipment and ordered the FF to dismantle the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, approximately 12 weeks of video injury to the victim G, and the victim F suffered bodily injury, such as the victim’s 2-do video injury with which the number of days of treatment can not be known, and the victim H suffered bodily injury, such as the bridge, etc. where the number of days of treatment cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Some statements made in the interrogation protocol of the prosecution concerning F;

1. The police statement of I and H;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of fire investigation, reply, and fire field identification;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 268 of the Criminal Act that is applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment is the incidental principle to the defendant's business.