logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.28 2018고단2352
범인도피교사등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a e-mail vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of D in Sungnam-si C, Sungnam-si, which is located in Sungnam-si, to the front side of the loading and unloading 101, according to the same Gu’s mountain, around 650 meters, from the front side of the 301 Sungnam-nam, the Defendant driven the E-mail vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license.

B. On June 14, 2018, in order to conceal the fact that the principal drives the said cargo without obtaining a driver’s license as set forth in paragraph 1(a) of the said Article, the principal also driven the said cargo to B, a spouse G of the de facto spouse in de facto marriage, with the intent to conceal the fact that the principal drives the said cargo without obtaining a driver’s license.

By asking for statements, B made a false confession.

Thus, around June 18, 2018, B stated that, at the H office of the Sungnam Police Station H of the Sungnam Police Station located in 1259, as Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the case was investigated, it was falsely stated to the effect that B driven the above cargo to I who was a policeman belonging to the Sungnam Police Station, who is investigating the case.

As a result, the defendant instigated the above B to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B stated to the effect that, around June 18, 2018, Defendant B driven the E-mail vehicle at the H office of the Sungnam Police Station H office located in 1259, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the date and place indicated in the above paragraph 1(a) but the Defendant was never driving the E-mail vehicle at the same time and place, Defendant B stated to the effect that the Defendant driven the E-mail vehicle as above.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Motor vehicle driver's license ledger, inquiry into shooting with the main office, vehicle goods and reports on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, generation reports (violation of road traffic laws), fire-proof reports (driving without a license), and related photographs of CCTV images of post offices;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow