Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On June 17, 2015, in order to engage in commercial sex acts in the Eelel operated by the Defendant, who is in Suwon-si, the Defendant provided that F, G, and H receive KRW 20,000 won per guest room from H, and provided each guest room.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic by providing a place for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of H or G;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. As to the Defendant’s argument regarding Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the workhouse, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant’s assertion is not guilty, since the Defendant and the defense counsel provided the entertainment room to the customers who come to the entertainment place in the neighborhood as part of the telecom business, as well as provided the entertainment room to the customers who come to the entertainment place in the neighborhood.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, i.e., H, at the I amusement shop, arrange sexual traffic with respect to two male customers, G, F, and F, ② G, and F, waiting in front of the amusement shop.

In light of the fact that a vehicle for entertainment business in the Eel, which is a vehicle for entertainment business, moved to the Eel, (3) G did not pay additional expenses and moved to the Eel, and (4) Defendant’s employees recorded and managed the number of guest rooms used in I in the account book, and the Defendant subsequently confirmed this fact, and (5) after the completion of the Eel’s business, in consideration of the fact that the Defendant, the owner of the Eel’s business, was aware of the fact that F and G had been intended to engage in entertainment business from H, the owner of the entertainment shop business, and that he provided them with a guest room.

Since it is reasonable to view the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel, we accept.