A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal history] On May 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for intrusion on a structure at night, larceny, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 12, 2017.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness, such as a detailed isolation, etc.

1. Larceny;

A. On December 27, 2016, around 12:18, 2016, the Defendant stated in the indictment that the market price of the victim’s possession, which was delivered by a selective distribution, in front of the restaurant operated by Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the victim D, is KRW 1.50,00 won, but according to evidence, it is recognized that the “140,00 won” was “140,00 won,” and such recognition is not disadvantageous to the Defendant’s right to defense, and thus, it is recognized as above without the amendment to the indictment

A considerable amount of co-ridges were stolen by 2 gamblings.

B. On December 27, 2016, around 13:00 on December 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) cut off the victim’s possession price attached before the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and H operated by the victim G, 1.20,000 won of the market price of the victim’s possession.

(c)

On December 27, 2016, around 13:10 on December 27, 2016, the Defendant stolen the victim-owned market price of KRW 94,800, which was set up in front of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu I and the K wholesale store operated by the Victim J by the Defendant 1.

2. On December 27, 2016, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) around 13:15, 201, the victim’s market value of the victim-owned L, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the N wholesale Store operated by the Victim M was 1 gambling place in the amount equivalent to KRW 45,00,000, and 36,000; (b) was discovered by the victim and attempted to steals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D, G, J, and M;

1. Ctv photographs;

1. Before judgment: Application of the text of the Act and subordinate statutes, such as a written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, a written summary of the case No. 2017No. 666, the Ulsan District Court Decision 2017No. 666, the Ulsan District Court Decision 2017 J. 258, the Ulsan District Court Decision 2017 J. 201

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of view) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment.