(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.21 2016고정1474

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.21 2016고정1474

모욕등

Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2016, around 19:45, the Defendant: (a) around the 602 guard room of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul building C, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul; (b) around the 602 guard room, the Defendant demanded the victim of the accident to enter his/her personal information and request the victim to take part in the accident.

However, whether the victim's "in the process of insurance" is not a victim, and the victim's identity is disclosed.

As stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant, at the seat, means that is, “Is not frighten, frighten,” and “Is frighten,” and “Is frighten,”

This son made a mistake so that it can not be boomed.

“The victim was openly insulting, while many and unspecified people such as apartment security guards report.”

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, she saw the victim D ( South Korea, 44 years old) to take a bath on the same ground as that set forth in paragraph 1, and laid down the victim’s breasts by hand, etc., and pushed off the victim’s chests on two occasions with the hand floor, and put about about two weeks of treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Complaint;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant expressed the victim's desire as stated in the No. 1 of the ruling at the time, or that the victim's chest was not involved or the victim's chest was not involved.

On the other hand, the victim appears to have asserted the assault of the defendant from the time he voluntarily reported 112 to the time of this court, and consistently and specifically stated the facts of damage (at the time when memory is partly distorted, although the legal statement is somewhat exaggerated than the initial statement, it seems that the defendant's memory is partly distorted). At the time of this, the victim was showing a brudy about the fact that the victim made the victim's statement to the victim's end-of-the-end statement to the victim, and the victim was under the situation.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고정2528

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.08.26 2016고단1964

-서울서부지방법원 2019.05.27 2019고단1253

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.06 2019고합695

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2016.04.29 2016고단74