logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.01 2016나2054573
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:

4. The 6th parallel of conduct “mutually agreed” shall be regarded as “mutually agreed.”

5 pages 1 to 5 of the "Evidence 1 to 5" of the 5th [based grounds for recognition] shall be "No. 3."

In the 5th 13th 13th am, the defendant's rescission of this case's advisory contract is without effect. "Therefore, the defendant's rescission of this case's advisory contract is not effective since the plaintiff did not act as an investment company in violation of the defendant's duty to cooperate with the above defendant."

Five parallels at the bottom of the 6th page “B Nos. 2, 4, 7, and 10” are raised “B Nos. 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10”.

In 7 pages 2, the "REC" in the table 2 is respectively dismissed as the "Project Resolution Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., Ltd." in

In the 8th 9th 9th 9th , the “Phere Emergy Cpo Corporation” is the “Phere Engy Cpo Corporation”.

9. The plaintiff's "the plaintiff" of the 6th 6th 6th 7th son and the 7th son shall be the defendant.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow