Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2014, at around 23:20 on March 25, 2014, the Defendant received 112 reports to the effect that he would threaten and imprisone pedestrians in Seoul, the Defendant was subject to the arrest of flagrant offenders by receiving notification of the principle of dissipated due to D conditions belonging to the Jungran Police Station C District, circumstances E, and assault against F.

As above, the Defendant, who arrested a flagrant offender, called “I Chewing, I am bling, I am bling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling and plicking I ambling I ambling.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of some police officers against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the nature of the crime in this case is not good for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, etc., and all the factors of sentencing as provided in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstance where the crime in this case was committed, circumstances after the crime in this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and occupation.