logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.02.19 2013고단3152
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

2. Defendant T-Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 18, 2012, after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in Busan District Court's Dong Branch, on June 26, 2012, it is currently under suspension of execution after the decision became final and conclusive on June 26, 2012, and on November 6, 2013, it is still under suspension of execution.

Defendant

T on June 5, 2013, the Busan District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months for fraud. On January 27, 2014, the judgment became final and conclusive by the ruling of dismissal of appeal on January 27, 2014. On November 29, 2013, Busan District Court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive by the ruling of dismissal of appeal on January 23, 2014.

The Defendants, at the Y mobile phone agency in the Nam-gu Busan metropolitan area, concluded that the Defendant A was a Z without obtaining the permission of the Z, and that two cell phoness were sent to the mobile phone in the name of the Z.

1. At around 18:00 on January 2, 2013, the Defendants entered “Z”, “AB apartment 910” in the passenger name column, “AA” in the resident registration number column, and the address column, and forged two copies of the new application in the name of the Z for the purpose of exercising the name of the Z in the name of the applicant’s signature, which is the private document concerning rights and obligations, and were issued to the above X in a lump sum as if the two copies of the new application forged to the above X were duly formed.

2. The Defendants also requested the victim X to open two cellphones in the name of Z at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and Defendant A, on that spot, had the victim X taken advantage of two copies of the forged new application.

Defendants belong to this.

arrow