A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 12:15, 2017, the Defendant, while drunk on a cell phone store located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, applied for a mobile phone license. However, the Defendant spits down the victim’s face on the face of the victim C (31 years old) without any case suitable for the Defendant’s mobile phone model, and assaulted twice the victim’s face by drinking.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place under paragraph 1, expressed his desire to “The Defendant, when she takes a view that she shall record the Defendant’s assault situation, such as that she would be under 22 years of age, and make a report to the police, she would be under her view that she would be under her eye, she would be under her eye, she shall have the victim’s residence, and that she would be under her eye, and that she would have any defect in E;

In today's Republic of Korea, the victim threatened the victim by stating that this breath year, breath year, and breathy, would go up before the house, as the breath breath breath breath would be found in the future of today's Republic of Korea.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested in the act of assault, etc. under paragraph (1) and was arrested in the act of assault, etc. on November 8, 2017, around 13:00, in order to move to the Seoul police station located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the police officer slope H, who belongs to the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station, to move to the police station in front of the G Police Station located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was on board the police station.

A. D. C. C. f., f.o. f., f., f.o. f., f.o. f., and f.o. f., the f.o. f. f., the f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Each written statement C, D, and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV images;

1. Articles 260(1) (the point of violence), 283(1) (the point of intimidation), and 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act related to criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment (the previous case may be allowed, and the contents and the crime of assault and intimidation in this case shall be committed.