logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.10.17 2014고합35
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Provided, That with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and E are the husband and wife’s simple, and Defendant A are the wife of Defendant B and E.

Defendant

B A A who was engaged in real estate brokerage, etc. and was sold in lots in the name of the defendant A in early 2009, the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 101 Dong 1103

7. 29. The registration of initial ownership was completed in the name of the defendant A, and the status of the right to sell prior thereto.

2. On March 16, 2009 to March 15, 2011, Defendant A, with the lessor, leased the said apartment to G who is an overseas Korean, with the lease term of KRW 450,00,000, and the lease period of the said apartment.

In 2010 and 2012, Defendant B was notified that the loan interest of approximately KRW 800,000,000 that was borrowed from the Korea SP World Bank may be overduely applied for auction from the said bank as collateral for the above apartment house, and the lessee G replaced the above apartment house with his domestic residence in lieu of the moving-in report under the Resident Registration Act, and did not appear in the details of the moving-in household inspection. As such, Defendant B conspired with Defendant A and her husband, who is the owner, to use the above apartment as collateral for the payment of overdue interest by receiving additional loan as collateral, and to prepare a loan document as if there was no lessee, and to instruct the Defendant A and her husband, who is the owner, to receive the loan as if there was no lessee.

1. On August 27, 2010, Defendant A filed an application for a loan of security with the victim H employees despite the fact that he/she leased KRW 450,00,000 to the above apartment building as above, Defendant A entered a false statement in the lease status of the lease certificate, stating that “B and his/her family are currently residing in the above apartment, and there is no lessee,” and Defendant A confirmed that he/she was false statement in the lease status of the lease certificate.

arrow