1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 11,580,000 against the Defendant and the Plaintiff shall be fully paid from September 24, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

1. The scope of the judgment of this court in the first instance against the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff claims for construction cost equivalent to KRW 8,921,158 under the contract for the manufacture and installation of the environmental facilities for the eroging plant (hereinafter “instant contract”); and (b) the claims for construction cost equivalent to KRW 60 million under each contract for the production and installation of the eroging plant (hereinafter “instant contract”) dated December 15, 2007 and May 19, 2008; (c) the claims for construction cost equivalent to KRW 12,532,000 under each contract for the manufacture and installation of the eroging plant (hereinafter “instant third contract”); and (d) the claims for construction cost pursuant to the instant contract for the eroging plant (hereinafter “instant third contract”); and (e) the claims for construction cost pursuant to the instant contract for the eroging construction cost were dismissed; and (e) the portion of the instant contract for construction cost was dismissed.

In regard to this, only the defendant appealed against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the cited amount of the part of the claim for construction cost under the contract of this case (20% interest per annum from September 24, 2013 to the date of full payment) among the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the claim for construction cost under the contract of this case 2 is limited to the part of the claim for construction cost under the contract of this case.

2. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing transportation machinery and steel structure. The Defendant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing transportation machinery and steel structure, and the Defendant is a company engaged in the business of operating environmental facilities and facilities and the business of treating sewage, etc. 2) The Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendant for manufacturing and installing environmental facilities throughout several times between the Defendant and the Defendant and the Defendant to install the production and installation of environmental facilities at the place designated by the Defendant.

B. The instant case.