1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of some contents as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and therefore, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In the judgment of the court of first instance 4-5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "It is possible to acknowledge the fact that the act of proxy of F has been ratified after the minimum agreement," and as follows, it can be recognized that the defendant's representative director of G has ratified the act of proxy of F by issuing a design change statement that he/she would pay the fee for the so-called pumps to F, as seen below, as stated in the following, since the defendant's representative director of G has confirmed the act of proxy of F by delivering a design change statement that he/she would pay the

B. The part (2) of the judgment is as follows: (2) The Defendant’s representative director G around October 18, 2017: (a) around October 18, 2017: (b) written name and signature on the “design Modification Statement (including Art. 7)” stating that “The Plaintiff will pay KRW 198,000,000 for the installation of the set pumps” (including the set-off pumps); and (c) deliver them to F.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.