logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (제주) 2018.06.20 2017누1942
12~‘13년 조사료생산기반확충사업 보조금 교부결정 변경 및 농림사업지원제한 처분 취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, so it is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the partial dismissal as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the "criminal and administrative sanctions" of the first instance No. 4 and the "administrative sanctions" of the first instance trial No. 10 and the first instance trial No. 7 shall be deemed to be each "regulatory", and the part of "the first disposition grounds" of the first instance trial No. 10 to 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be determined as follows, and as mentioned above, the initial disposition grounds are focused on the result; while the additional disposition grounds are focused on the procedure, the additional disposition grounds are not allowed between the two dispositions different from the nature and contents of the judgment. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be cited for the grounds for appeal of the court of first instance, and since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, it is dismissed as the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow