Text
1. On December 24, 2019, the Defendant’s second written examination study subjects II for the second semester of D High School 2 and 2019 for the Plaintiff on December 24, 2019.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. At the time of 2019, the Plaintiff was a student who was attending the second year of D High School under the Defendant’s jurisdiction of Yeonsu-gu Incheon (hereinafter “instant school”).
B. On December 17, 2019, the Plaintiff applied for the 2nd class examination of the second class of the second class of the second class of the second class of the second class of the second class of the year in 2019 (hereinafter “instant examination”).
At the time, two supervisory officers (one teacher in charge of examination supervision and one parent in charge of examination supervision) have entered each subject for the prevention of misconduct, divided the answer site and the test site to the students, and the students are allowed to begin the examination on the west, and after the end of the examination, the students were allowed to collect the answer site in the order of the supervising teacher.
(c)
At the time of the examination of this case, the Plaintiff, who was seated after the last half-year class of the second grade class 8 of this case at the time of the examination of this case, collected and submitted a multiple-choice card (OMR)-type and descriptive answer sheet to the supervisor by the direction of the supervisor (F).
(d)
On December 23, 2019, after the completion of the instant test, the Plaintiff’s teacher (G) demanded the Plaintiff to prepare a explanatory note, stating that “the Plaintiff had made a false report from another student on the fact that the Plaintiff prepared an answer sheet after the completion of the instant test.” The Plaintiff refused to prepare a explanatory note while making it difficult for the Plaintiff to do so.
Since then, the teacher asked H to provide the Plaintiff’s instruction, as the teacher was locked in order to report to the assistant principal, and the Plaintiff collected the answer sheet that was rapidly written at the last reduction and answer of the answer sheet No. 2 at the time of the completion of the examination in the form of H teachers together with H teachers (the Plaintiff collected the answer sheet No. 2 at the time of the completion of the examination in this case).