beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty.
Reasons
1. Defendant A is the president of the E Apartment Women’s Association, and Defendant B is the president of the E Apartment Women’s Association.
Around 21:00 on March 21, 2013, at the council of occupants' representatives in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives, the victim F (the victim F (the victim 47 years of age, the female) was aware of the female conference and did not hear his opinion, and the defendant B was dissatisfied with the victim's arms, and the defendant B was seated in the house without hearing his opinion. The facts charged before the change was made by the victim's arms, "A was divided into the victim's shoulder." However, after the witness and H testimony on the fourth trial date, the prosecutor changed the "the defendant A was seated in the victim's arms on several occasions."
The member was seated on the chair.
Defendants jointly assaulted the victim as above.
2. However, there is evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in this case, F, I's own police and legal statement.
However, in light of the witness G and H’s respective legal statements, and the structure of the conference room at the time, the statement to the effect that Defendant A, by hand, takes the victim’s shoulder in order to sit F, Defendant B deviates from F’s external dose at the bar, and Defendant A deviates from F’s external dose, and Defendant A attempted to leave F’s female members, etc., and Defendant A’s statement to the effect that it goes beyond F’s own discretion, cannot be trusted because it is excessively exaggerationd.
Rather, comprehensively taking account of the above G and H’s respective legal statements and the Defendants’ police and legal statements, F was asked to blick the women’s meeting at the time of the closing of the meeting, and the president of women’s association and the Defendants, the general secretary, who were identified as a party to the corruption, were asked F to disclose the content of the objection to F. However, F was defective by leaving the meeting that occurred in the chair without disclosing the objection.