logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.04.04 2013고단312
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is engaged in driving multi-user vehicles.

On January 30, 2013, the defendant driving the above vehicle around 02:40 on January 30, 2013, and led to the left turn to the left at the strengthening side of the protegic acid distance in the area of Kimpo-si in the city of Kimpo-si.

The location is an intersection where the vehicle signal apparatus is installed, and in this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in the driving of the vehicle, to live well on the right and the right, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle safely in accordance with the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim D's right-hand bridge that has been crossed without permission from the right-hand side of the course of the vehicle without permission from the right-hand side of the above vehicle to go beyond the upper part of the left-hand side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as 12 weeks of occupational negligence, i.e., e. blavers from the right-hand lavers and lavers from e.g.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each photograph;

1. Signal tag, CCTV photograph;

1. A letter of accusation and a copy of check;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine to impose a sentence (such consideration as the fact that the accused is repenting of the error, the fact that the accused recovers damage and the victim complains of the accused's wife by agreement with the injured party, and the accused has no previous convictions);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow