logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.06.25 2014고단656
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 16:30 on June 27, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Busan District Court 208, which was located in Busan District Court 31, the Busan District Court, the Busan District Court 2012Kadan27205, which was held as a witness of the execution of the procedure for the registration of the transfer of the ownership of motor vehicles and gave testimony.

1. The Defendant testified, in the above court, that “I do not know whether I will receive KRW 150 million for the purchase of two vehicles of D. D.” by the Defendant’s agent.

However, in fact, the defendant was issued KRW 140 million on December 10, 201, and KRW 10 million on January 6, 201, respectively, as the purchase cost of D's vehicles from C's attached E.

2. In the above court, the Defendant testified to the above Defendant’s agent’s “I cannot answer the question whether the witness received a refund equivalent to 10% of the purchase price at the time of purchasing a new truck with a new vehicle.”

However, on April 8, 2011, the Defendant received a refund of KRW 12,275,540 from the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant.

3. In the above court, the Defendant testified to the above Defendant’s agent’s “I would not have a talk about the establishment of a second-class collateral security at the time when the F, the Defendant, and his father met with G” in the question of “I would like to have demanded the establishment of a second-class collateral security for all three trucks.”

However, around December 1, 2011, there was a discussion about the establishment of a second-class collective security right on C, E, F, and I27 tons of trucks in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in Jin-si.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each investigation report, telephone investigation- complainants, and the submission of a statement of remittance of refund to the NAC Account, submission of F witness examination records in the case of implementation of the procedures for the transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle, submission of telephone investigation-D, and submission of telephone investigation-K, telephone investigation-F;

arrow