logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고단2721
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 15, 2010 to October 10, 2010, the Defendant is a person who has worked as the chief of technology in charge of mechanical checkup and maintenance at a DNA printing plant operated by the victim.

On September 13, 2012, the Defendant appeared in the court No. 113 of Ulsan District Court No. 113, 201Gahap7440, 2012Gahap6307, Plaintiff E Company F and Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Appellant”) as a witness of the claim lawsuit, and testified as follows.

1. The facts revealed that the Defendant was in charge of the mechanical checkup and maintenance at the time of the Plaintiff’s agent’s employment and was directly inspected by the Defendant in order to find the cause due to the malfunction in the instant 8th Ming-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing, and that the Defendant could not supply printed materials within the customer due to the malfunction in the instant leing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing, and in order to solve this problem, the Defendant testified that, while the Defendant was in office of the Plaintiff’s agent, there was no fact that the instant le-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing at the time of the Defendant’s office, the Defendant testified that “The meaning of the Plaintiff’s agent’s “

The former is also related to the machinery side, and only ‘a confirmation' is written when the witness confirms on the machinery side because there is no anything else.

Then, the Plaintiff did not request G director to help him around March 2010 on the ground of the failure of "If the Plaintiff completed the construction work of middle leap TV on February 28, 2010, the Plaintiff would not request G director to help him around 2010 on the ground of the failure in the middle leap TV parone (the situation where the Plaintiff maintained at a speed as a new site after site was consumed and automatically connected).

“The defendant’s agent.”

arrow