Defendant

A A Fines 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of F Truck as the representative E in Pakistan, and Defendant B is the owner of G Truck as the business director of E, and Defendant C is the owner of G Truck at the time of strike.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B, while operating the alternative ship company, knew that they should immediately pay oil for the pertinent cargo vehicle with the oil purchase card issued unique to each cargo vehicle, and that they should comply with the procedures for paying fuel subsidies as stipulated under the relevant laws and regulations, they avoid the provisions limited to the payment of fuel subsidies per cargo vehicle, and they were willing to receive fuel subsidies by fraud or other improper means, such as paying fuel expenses for the relevant cargo vehicle not subject to the fuel purchase card, for the purpose of receiving the fuel subsidies.

On July 2018, when the Defendants received fuel purchase cards of F and G Trucks (hereinafter referred to as “instant trucks”) from the competent authority after being registered with the competent authority, they kept 769 liters via the E-storage tank located in Hamju-si Hamju-si (H) in custody on July 23, 2018. They were divided into five vehicles with no fuel subsidies such as the instant trucks and JJ, K, L, M, N, etc. Around July 23, 2018, C, who received orders from the Defendants, kept the fuel purchase cards of the instant trucks in advance at the International Oil Station around 18:07, and received the said subsidies from each of the competent authorities over KRW 250 and KRW 40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).