logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2012.11.09 2012고합198
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강간등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for ten years, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for five years, respectively.

Defendant

Information on A is disclosed to the public.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On June 14, 2007, Defendant A and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”) were sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Jeonju District Court’s mountain support, which became final and conclusive on June 22, 2007, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju Prison on April 25, 2008.

Defendant

A From August 2009, the victim E is a person in de facto marital relationship with F (class 2) who is the mother of the victim E, and the defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant B") and the defendant and the person subject to an attachment order C (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant C") were known to the victim, and the victim is a intellectual disability whose intelligence index is 47 years of age and 6 months of age and 6 months of age and ability to make decisions.

Defendant

B is a disabled person of intellectual disability Grade III, whose mental age is 49 years old and 6 months old and 6 months, and Defendant C also intelligence index is 55 years old and mental age is 7 years old and 9 months old and 3 years old. Defendant B and C had weak ability to distinguish things or make decisions due to lower intelligence at the time of each of the instant crimes.

1. Defendant A, around October 2009, at the house living together with the victim E (the age of 12 at that time) located in Y in Y in Yasan-si, Defendant A, after completion of the school, had the victim who was incurred on his own side, and had the victim sexual intercourse with the victim E.

The defendant, using that the victim is a minor who has no mental age to consent to sexual intercourse with a minor who is incapable of consenting to sexual intercourse, putting his hand in the victim's clothes, talks with the chest of the victim, and "I see why I am "I am only" against the victim who is called "I am. I am. I am.", and sexual intercourse with the victim's will and panty after suppressing the victim's resistance against the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant is a minor victim under 13 years of age.

arrow